by stevieg » Mon Oct 20, 2003 4:41 pm
MichaelP, If you have read my previous posts you would know that I am not some newbie that doesnt know anything about wireless, I'm not gonna get in a pissing match with you, please if you dont have anything constructive to say please keep it to yourself.
I was asking for the help of the truly educated wireless guru's that do frequent this board and I have already heard from them and they have provided the answers I needed via PM and they agree with me on my diagnosis.
Obviously you have not read the FCC regulations pertaining to this kind of situation as I had not either, but here is an excerp from it
(a) For a Class A digital device or peripheral, the instructions furnished the user shall include the following or similar statement, placed in a prominent location in the text of the manual:
This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class A digital device, pursuant to part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference when the equipment is operated in a commercial environment. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instruction manual, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. Operation of this equipment in a residential area is likely to cause harmful interference in which case the user will be required to correct the interference at his own expense.
Now this clearly states my right as a user who is being interefered with, now whether or not I pursue this is at my discretion and as long as the WISP is at least semi accomodating and will "try" and help me out I will do nothing. BUT if he takes the attitude that you have here I would pursue it and guess what would you really want to jeopardize your whole WISP business as a result of being a jerk?
Steve