![]() |
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
rerunn run run
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: way up north
Posts: 70
|
The RGM2000 is the sapphire
See here: http://www.royaltek.com/Manuals/rgm-2000.pdf or here for google'ized html version: http://www.google.ca/search?q=cache:...&hl=en&ie=UTF8 rerunn Last edited by rerunn : 06-08-2002 at 04:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 261
|
interesting, and cool. strange that they'd advertise all those chips and have a finished product right in there with them, in the naming scheme and everything. very slick though. perhaps we can get 10 people to go in on these? i'm in.
Last edited by lullabud : 06-08-2002 at 04:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
rerunn run run
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: way up north
Posts: 70
|
digging and comparing specs....
The sapphire's position accuracy is rated a 25 meters without SA. In comparision, the etrex's are rated at less than 15 meters and 3-5 meters if the model has dgps. As well, in the velocity accuracy category the etrex seems better with 0.05 m/s accuracy versus the sapphire's 0.1 m/s accuracy. Can someone with better understanding provide some opinions on these figures. Is the 15 meters versus 25 meters that much of a difference in the gps world?? How much of a diff does the 1 sec sampling rate in the sapphire versus the 2 sec rate in the etrex make?? Is that such a big deal?? How about SA -- I heard that the US government canned this stuff a while back, does this mean that all gps units can take advantage of this?? Many questions... thanks for your time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Squaaawk! WiFi! WiFi!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tinsel Town
Posts: 1,682
|
i think the RGM-2000 is the guts of the sapphire...
meaning GPS engine board/antenna...not the whole thing w/ case/cable. interesting that the royaltek spec shows those specs. here are the specs directly from SiRF: http://www.sirf.com/downloads/collat...t%20Insert.PDF considerably better than what royaltek quotes. actually this is what i've found for GPS's...wildly varying differences in claimed specs for units using the same h/w. personaly i've found that accuracy ratings are basically meaningless in practice. i've used quite a few different models and from day to day the accuracy fluctuates quite a bit even when they claim to have a low DOP (dilution of precision). the 2sec sampling rate doesn't really make any difference for stumbling. but if you want to use it w/ navigation software, it's too slow for accurate realtime map tracking...and the voice guidance will lag too much too. i wish someone could convince garmin to let the NMEA update @ 1sec intervals too...no reason for it not to since the same h/w can update @ 1sec intervals in garmin mode. SA was used to degrade the signal of consumer GPS's. now that it's off all GPS's are automatically more accurate. btw, leadtek also has a SiRF-II gps mouse, but i don't know if it's been released to retail yet. the one i have is a preproduction sample. http://www.leadtek.com/gps/gps9532/9532.htm the leadtek is a little wider and flatter. btw, both of them have magnets so you can stick them to your roof. one thing i really like about the SiRF GPS's is there is a little utility that lets you tune everything from baud rate to what NMEA sentences it spits out to even the interval of each sentence.
__________________
~lincomatic Last edited by lincomatic : 06-08-2002 at 05:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
rerunn run run
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: way up north
Posts: 70
|
rgm2000 == sapphire ??
From my earlier post (below), the company was offering the rgm2000 with either the ps2 or usb interface in black and gold.
Black and gold colors just like the casing they have posted on royalteks website here: http://www.royaltek.com/proditem.asp...g1gpsmouse.jpg Nonetheless, I've emailed them for more info and clarification. Thanks for the insight, linco. rerunn Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 261
|
you know, i was doing all these mathematical calculations of how fast you'd need to be driving in order to achieve the same inaccuracies between 1 second update time and 25 meters of inaccuracy vs 2 second update time and 15 meters of inaccuracy but i was just getting a head ache and it's not worth it... linc is right, it's not that big of a deal on a day to day basis. i mean, what's our requirement for accuracy here? i'd say that 25 meters isn't incredibly bad for marking where on the globe a wireless signal is coming from. my gpsV is supposed to have 15 meters of accuracy too... how wide are streets? all my maps come up as having my waypoints on the street, and since you're probably going to be driving there you'll get the gist of where the network is anyhow. perhaps if i get the sapphire i'll go for a war drive on a specific route with the gpsV and then repeat it with the sapphire to see the difference of AP placement... all in all i think either the etrex yellow or the sapphire would be perfectly fine for war driving.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Squaaawk! WiFi! WiFi!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tinsel Town
Posts: 1,682
|
Re: rgm2000 == sapphire ??
Quote:
i have them w/ ps2 and PDA cabling (jornada/ipaq/casio w/ lighter plug).
__________________
~lincomatic Last edited by lincomatic : 06-08-2002 at 05:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
rerunn run run
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: way up north
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
Squaaawk! WiFi! WiFi!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tinsel Town
Posts: 1,682
|
Quote:
__________________
~lincomatic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 261
|
definitely. i'd say for anything non-outdoors a PDA GPS is best. only reason i have a gpsV is because i do mountain climbing and the PDA solutions i've seen don't handle mountaneering very well. however, i'd still considering forking over the dough for a PDA instead of a proprietary GSP only device......
<embed inspirational soundtrack> ::gritting teeth:: still not sure if i did the right thing, but there's no looking back, that bridge has burned.... gotta move on and think about the future... |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Squaaawk! WiFi! WiFi!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tinsel Town
Posts: 1,682
|
yeah, i agree w/ you..for hiking/mountaineering, the handheld gps is the way to go. a pocketpc w/ CF GPS is nice until the li-ion batteries die after a coupla hrs and yr left in the cold.
__________________
~lincomatic |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Do I look like I'm joking
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SoCal, OC
Posts: 4,507
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
-=BW=- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 261
|
luckily? how is that so luckily? i don't see anything on a day to day basis that requires a GPS signal to be within 25 meters. if i'm going to drive to a WLAN i think i can find my way there within the last 25 meters...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) | |
|
KB1JQO - Packin' Heat
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 517
|
Quote:
Another item I can neither confirm nor deny is that you can cook your GPS if you get within one square mile of the White House. However, I'm not in DC and don't quite have the means to undertake that kind of test. ![]()
__________________
-A.G.- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Olymp's Stumbler
Join Date: May 2002
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 64
|
If there are some interested guys in germany out there who would love to buy one of the royaltek gps mouse, here are to resellers:
as you can see, the price is quite high, but i thought it might be worth to know where you can by it in germany.
__________________
|<€€þ !ŧ ®€4|_, apoLLon ..:: All your 802.11b are belong to us ::.. |
|
|
|