NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > WiFi Forums > Stumbling Setups
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-13-2007   #1 (permalink)
Mark57
What??
 
Mark57's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: OKC
Posts: 1,240
Janus Project style Stumble rig

I've been making a parts list and creating a design over the last few days for a Janus Project style stumbling setup. It's very doable. What I can't decide on is how to arrange the antennas and their connections to the cards. I want all the antennas to be amped with a mix of directional and omni types but my quandary is how to do that and still take advantage of the separate channel scanning of the 8 cards. I could do 8 omni's on the roof and look like an FCC unit driving down the road.

I suppose I could use two or four way power splitters and run one amped antenna for every two or four cards. Insertion loss runs 0.4 - 0.6 dB for the two types of splitters. Any thoughts on this are welcome.
Mark57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007   #2 (permalink)
shamrock365
Registered User
 
shamrock365's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 148
May I just say well done for getting this far. Fair play and best of luck with the rig. Where are the official specs on the Janus Project by the way? And what Linux Distro does it run? Building one was sort of on my wish list.

Best Of Luck,

Shamrock365

Last edited by shamrock365 : 02-13-2007 at 08:11 AM.
shamrock365 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007   #3 (permalink)
itsnotme
Dumbass checker
 
itsnotme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Somewhere below Lake Ontario
Posts: 1,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by shamrock365
May I just say well done for getting this far. Fair play and best of luck with the rig. Where are the official specs on the Janus Project by the way? And what Linux Distro does it run? Building one was sort of on my wish list.

Best Of Luck,

Shamrock365
I read this: article on it which was posted by Madhatter here earlier. If you had actually searched and read around, you would have discovered that they ran Ubuntu Linux with 8 a/b/g mini-pci cards.
itsnotme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007   #4 (permalink)
Mark57
What??
 
Mark57's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: OKC
Posts: 1,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by shamrock365
May I just say well done for getting this far. Fair play and best of luck with the rig. Where are the official specs on the Janus Project by the way? And what Linux Distro does it run? Building one was sort of on my wish list.

Best Of Luck,

Shamrock365
The link I gave above gives you a taste of the hardware used. There are other articles that give slightly different details on other hardware parts if you look around.

I'm not trying to duplicate exactly what they've done rather leverage their mini-pci idea to make an optimal stumbling rig. Ideally, the maximum networks can be found by having a dedicated card for each channel. I'm using the mini-pci method that the Janus Project used to accomplish this.
Mark57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007   #5 (permalink)
whitedice
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 61
Nearly all of my antennas are N-male or N-female connectors, and from the searching I've done a lot of the miniPCI cards I have seen have u.FL connectors. FAB-Corp sells u.FL pigtails to various connectors for $10.99.
whitedice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007   #6 (permalink)
Mark57
What??
 
Mark57's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: OKC
Posts: 1,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitedice
Nearly all of my antennas are N-male or N-female connectors, and from the searching I've done a lot of the miniPCI cards I have seen have u.FL connectors. FAB-Corp sells u.FL pigtails to various connectors for $10.99.
Very true. My question comes beyond that point. I'd use the u.Fl to N type pigtails on each card but I still have to come up with a good way to bridge those to the various antennas. If each card is scanning one channel only you want it to have the opportunity to see the maximum area, and so on for each card. Connecting them all to omni's is one way but I'd like to use high gain panels as well. I'm sure it's doable. The config just hasn't revealed itself to me yet.
Mark57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007   #7 (permalink)
Mark57
What??
 
Mark57's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: OKC
Posts: 1,240
What I'd "like" to do is use one or two omni's on top, and four 19 dBi Patch Antenna's, 2 per side. Each side would have one aimed around 45 degrees (or less) forward and one aimed 45 degrees (or less) to the rear on each side. I've done the measurements and have the room for placement and coverage angles. Unless there's something I'm missing, I just don't see the Janus style box lending itself to that type of antenna setup.

So I'm trying to merge what I see as the ideal antenna setup with the ideal computer setup and that's where I'm having the problem.

To me, Omni's make more sense with the Janus setup and a 2 or 3 card setup fits the antenna arrangement I described above.
Mark57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007   #8 (permalink)
streaker69
Psychic Amish Stumbler
 
streaker69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 12,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark57
What I'd "like" to do is use one or two omni's on top, and four 19 dBi Patch Antenna's, 2 per side. Each side would have one aimed around 45 degrees (or less) forward and one aimed 45 degrees (or less) to the rear on each side. I've done the measurements and have the room for placement and coverage angles. Unless there's something I'm missing, I just don't see the Janus style box lending itself to that type of antenna setup.

So I'm trying to merge what I see as the ideal antenna setup with the ideal computer setup and that's where I'm having the problem.

To me, Omni's make more sense with the Janus setup and a 2 or 3 card setup fits the antenna arrangement I described above.
Why not just build something that will sweep your patch antenna's 45° each direction, then you'd get the maximum coverage.
__________________
Treat your gun like your genitals, only whip it out when it's absolutely necessary.
streaker69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007   #9 (permalink)
Barry
Managing the iTards.
 
Barry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,875
I've been looking into the same thing. www.mini-itx.com has the same computer used in the project. They also carry the dual pci riser card.
__________________
Never do anything you don't want to explain to the paramedics.
Barry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007   #10 (permalink)
Mark57
What??
 
Mark57's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: OKC
Posts: 1,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by streaker69
Why not just build something that will sweep your patch antenna's 45° each direction, then you'd get the maximum coverage.
That's an excellent idea and fixes the coverage issue. Now I still have to connect those in a way the each card can use them.

The farther I go with this, I'm thinking it makes more sense to use 4 or 6 mini-pci cards rather than 8 and modify the source channels settings for each based on the antenna connections. This takes me away from one card for each channel but it'll still have better performance than one or two cards.
Mark57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007   #11 (permalink)
streaker69
Psychic Amish Stumbler
 
streaker69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 12,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark57
That's an excellent idea and fixes the coverage issue. Now I still have to connect those in a way the each card can use them.

The farther I go with this, I'm thinking it makes more sense to use 4 or 6 mini-pci cards rather than 8 and modify the source channels settings for each based on the antenna connections. This takes me away from one card for each channel but it'll still have better performance than one or two cards.
http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?inv...NER-NC&cat=VID

I have one of these, except it's the remote controlled one. Depending upon the weight of your patch antenna's they could possible work for you.

Only problem is, they run off of 9VAC.
__________________
Treat your gun like your genitals, only whip it out when it's absolutely necessary.
streaker69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007   #12 (permalink)
Mark57
What??
 
Mark57's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: OKC
Posts: 1,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry
I've been looking into the same thing. www.mini-itx.com has the same computer used in the project. They also carry the dual pci riser card.
The whole idea just makes sense to me. I haven't decided how I'm going to monitor the system from the driver's seat just yet. It might be as simple as a crossover cable to my navigation laptop or a 7" LCD on the dash.

Quote:
Originally Posted by streaker69
http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?inv...NER-NC&cat=VID

I have one of these, except it's the remote controlled one. Depending upon the weight of your patch antenna's they could possible work for you.

Only problem is, they run off of 9VAC.
Sweet! Power conversion can be done without too much pain. Very interesting.
Mark57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007   #13 (permalink)
beakmyn
Free Public Wifi
 
beakmyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,989
http://home.utah.edu/~mcm5849/wince/vnc.html

or other variant
__________________
┌──────────────────────────────┐
NS Icons Explained|et hoc genus omne
└──────────────────────────────┘


Creating yesterday's future, Today!
beakmyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007   #14 (permalink)
Mark57
What??
 
Mark57's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: OKC
Posts: 1,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by beakmyn
I could use my HTC 8125 in a pinch with a long USB cable.
Mark57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007   #15 (permalink)
beakmyn
Free Public Wifi
 
beakmyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,989
I just tried the VNC client on my Ipaq, not bad might be pretty good since my Axim is 640x480 and kismet looks nice at that resolution, hmmm.
__________________
┌──────────────────────────────┐
NS Icons Explained|et hoc genus omne
└──────────────────────────────┘


Creating yesterday's future, Today!
beakmyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.