![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 40
|
network detection at speed
mmmmm, someone said that they loose the ability to chat over wlan at 50mph - well I routinely run a wlan sniffer in the car when driving on motorways at 70+ MPH and I pick up the same 50 or 60 ap's that are within range. Admittedly I'm using a amplified receive only antenna with kismet / WSA but that shouldnt make much difference.
regards, mr_wlan |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Northern Suburbs, Chicago, IL
Posts: 142
|
Exactly what rules apply to dishes for specific frequencies?
I am wondering what diameters of collapsable strainer woudl be needed for a proper 2.4 dish... or would the size of the dish part be less an issue than the size/etc of the feeder part? I am thinking of modifying one of these with a Servo and some mods so it is self opening and such. Have the ability to change its focus ratio or close it all together... then give it rotation up and down and, say be modified X10 Ninja pan/tilt... could be interesting...
__________________
-Jeffrowe |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Did you do the math?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,084
|
jeffrowe,
Get the ARRL antenna book. The feed horn size is critical, I think, but the dish size does make some difference.
__________________
Thorn "I'm The Doctor. I'm a Time Lord. I am from the planet Gallifrey in the constellation Kasterborous. I'm 903 years old and I am the man who is going to save your lives and all 6 billion people on the planet below... You got a problem with that?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2
|
Re: Mobile WLAN
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
Do I look like I'm joking
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SoCal, OC
Posts: 4,507
|
Quote:
__________________
-=BW=- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Do I look like I'm joking
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SoCal, OC
Posts: 4,507
|
Quote:
AP_1 at the event horizon and AP_2 approaching the singularity if AP_1 were at location X, and AP_2 were at location Z, it is possible that AP_1 would be reporting back a distance of U, while AP_2 would be reporting back a distance of V, where U!=V. I haven't tried this myself... yet, so take it for face value. ![]()
__________________
-=BW=- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Do I look like I'm joking
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SoCal, OC
Posts: 4,507
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
-=BW=- |
|
|
|
|