![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
The Pope
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 243
|
2 antennas on one card
I have seen the two antenna connectors on the cisco card, but I was wondering if there was a way to add two antennas to a Lucent Gold/Silver that only has one connector. Could a pigtail be split into two differant antenna connections?
__________________
~:CK:~ http://ck3k.org http://deathbywifi.com |
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Drunken Stumbler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Anywhere but Utah
Posts: 1,803
|
The only way to do it sensibly would be to use a proper splitter on the end of your pigtail, going to each antenna.
www.fab-corp.com has them. Accessories - 3rd from the bottom. |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
The Pope
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 243
|
would that cuase any form of interferance, due to the ammount of data the antennas would be collecting? It seems like a good deal, cause it would be easier to have the directional and omni on the same laptop stumbling at the same time.
__________________
~:CK:~ http://ck3k.org http://deathbywifi.com |
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denver
Posts: 6
|
Yes, you would have severe interference. This topic has been covered before. Your main problem is the massive db loss caused by the splitter. The quality of the signal will be degraded, making it impractical unless you have a very high db antenna.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Church of WiFi
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: not behind you, or am I?
Posts: 290
|
Actually, I have used the splitter in question for my 14.5dB directionals.. and the loss isn't that bad.
Another option would be to shoot for the Senao card, which has two external-only connectors ($110-125?)... it is decent, but prism-based, so netstumblers proceed with knowledge.. Your only other option would be running a second Orinoco on the box....
__________________
He shall recount his worthies: they shall stumble in their walk; they shall make haste to the wall thereof, and the defence shall be prepared. -- Nahum 2:5, The Holy Bible, KJV |
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
The Pope
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 243
|
Sign me up for one of those. If the price is right its either one of those or the cisco for me. The splitters DB loss is a problem cause my omni is very weak, and the directional would be very strong. adidans- All Day I Dream About Net Stumbling..........
![]()
__________________
~:CK:~ http://ck3k.org http://deathbywifi.com |
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
PTP to PTMP
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tucson
Posts: 150
|
I believe those port on that card work in diversity mode, so using two directional antennas in differant directions may not give you the results you want.
Anyone tried that?
__________________
<><><><><><><><><><><> Razta |
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
The Pope
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
So the only true option is to shove two cards in my lappy and run an antenna off each? but then NS wouldn't work properly, so i guess the spliter is the way to go.
__________________
~:CK:~ http://ck3k.org http://deathbywifi.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2
|
Read this.
Search down the page for "diversity antenna systems." Having two antennae hooked up to a splitter will screw up the signal more than it will help. |
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
PTP to PTMP
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tucson
Posts: 150
|
I have run splitters before. They dont screw things up, but do insert a bunch of signal loss.
Might have to add an amplifier to get any good range out of it. If your just listening with netstumbler, then amp probably wont be needed.
__________________
<><><><><><><><><><><> Razta |
|
|