![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
...blub
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South East England, near London
Posts: 37
|
Administrating a Public AP
Hey
At the moment, I'm helping my school set up an AP for the sixth form common room (I'm part of the student council). What we are trying to achive is set up an AP which we can monitor easily, and work out who has paid their share to use the AP (we're organising it so you must give a donation in order to use the wireless Internet access... just so we can pay the ISP's bills). In other words we want to make sure that unauthorised users cannot use the connection (isn't that the whole point of network security?). I saw an article in .net mag a while ago involving AirSnare, or somthing like that, to prevent people from using an AP. We don't have any gear yet, so all suggestions are welcome as to the sort of setup we should think about. We're getting an ADSL line installed, so I think its probably better value getting a router with modem, rather than a PC with modem and a wireless card with NAT running on it. MAC filtering is certainly an option, as is WEP, but that would mean someone could spoof the MAC address of a legit user, or possibly use an ARP inject. Appart from anything, people might get new cards. Sorry about the long-ness! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Psychic Amish Stumbler
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 12,239
|
Quote:
MAC Filtering and WEP should be enabled on your AP. Anyone that pays their dues should be required to give you their MAC address of the card they're going to connect to. Subscription should probably be based per MAC, not per user. If someone wants two MAC's listed, they should pay two subscriptions. That will keep some weenies away. Someone could spoof a MAC and crack the WEP, but you also have to realize that there are easier targets for people that are prone to do that kind thing to hit. If you make it difficult for them to get in, they'll probably just move on to the neighbor with LINKSYS as their SSID on Channel 6 with the Router IP Of 192.168.1.1.
__________________
Treat your gun like your genitals, only whip it out when it's absolutely necessary. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Managing the iTards.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,882
|
Also run it past the school's or school district's it department. Our policy is if we find an access point we didn't install we keep it. We're getting quite a collection.
__________________
Never do anything you don't want to explain to the paramedics. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Psychic Amish Stumbler
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 12,239
|
Quote:
__________________
Treat your gun like your genitals, only whip it out when it's absolutely necessary. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
Also, Goldfish, though I'm no expert, I've seen some places use various authentication screens when someone tries to connect to the WAN (my local Panera for instance). Maybe they do this through DHCP and proxies, so that might be another place for an authentication layer. Rj |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
PeaceDriver
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dos Palabras, Mandoras
Posts: 2,920
|
Quote:
__________________
all good ends all ?u=273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
...blub
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South East England, near London
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
Of course, we will be using WEP, as a matter of course. Funnily enough that you say about the linksys router next door, I was surveying the area with netstumbler, (war-walking, if you want to put it like that ) and there is in fact a good signal from an AP a few meters away from the school, with no WEP, broadcasting its SSID like nobodies business to the whole world. Even though I did not attempt to gain access, the SSID was the default (I assume) and I expect the root password would also be default Anyway. I'm going along two trains of thought here. Either a per hardware or a per user. Per hardware would be much much easier to setup (its just MAC filtering), but that also requires that the user always uses the same card, OR someone could steal someones network card and gain access. Per user means that only the PEOPLE that have paid get access, not their machines. But also, if someone leaks their password .... Or maybe a combination of both? They are required to register their MAC with us, and we then give them a username and password. Is that overkill? We would have to put the WEP key on the wall somewhere, so if we change it people will know about it. NoCatAuth seems like a perfect solution BUT... it requires we have a standalone machine acting as a gateway. $$moola$$ A dilema. Thanks for all the suggestions ![]() EDIT: Oh yes and Access Point Collectors : this isnt a rogue AP, we've been talking with the IT department for ages trying to get it set up, and they basically said "go on then"... so we are ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
PeaceDriver
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dos Palabras, Mandoras
Posts: 2,920
|
Nocat can be run on a linksys WRT54G router, as can the chillispot captive portal functions of wolfs firmware, see here:
http://slashdot.org/~TheIndividual/journal/ As for using WEP and posting the key on the wall... Why bother? That rather does remove the point of using WEP. I wouldn't use WEP or MAC filtering (not simple type in MAC address filtering anyway). You could always investigate some sort of RADIUS server or something. I wouldn't bother, however, I'd just run chillispot. I think running too many security precautoins is un-neccessary for a public access point such as this. You are also making a lot of work for yourself in the process. EDIT= You should definatly look at this: http://www.portless.net/menu/ewrt/ And this: http://www.tinypeap.com/index.html
__________________
all good ends all ?u=273
Last edited by The Others : 01-06-2005 at 04:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Alien Paranoid Stumbler
Join Date: May 2003
Location: WI
Posts: 2,688
|
The Linksys stuff used to be junk, with the power supplies frying and capacitors exploding. I think they got them straightened out. I have the Linksys Wrt54G. If you have any amount of nerd in you, this AP is absolutely AWSOME. The most fun I have had in a long time.
__________________
"Yeah," said a voice from under the table, "you go to pieces so fast people get hit by the shrapnel." |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Alien Paranoid Stumbler
Join Date: May 2003
Location: WI
Posts: 2,688
|
I got mine from amazon.com for like 45 with shipping and tax... And I got a $10 mail in rebate.
__________________
"Yeah," said a voice from under the table, "you go to pieces so fast people get hit by the shrapnel." |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
...blub
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South East England, near London
Posts: 37
|
Well, for USAers its pretty useless, and wouldn't seem that cheap, but to brits its damn cheap for a wireless router
![]() http://www.dabs.com/uk/Search2/Produ...ksys%20WRT54GS http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=116773 http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/...879902-0436407 Amazon.co.uk is t3h coole5t ![]() EDIT: Oh no, the big A-Z has been beaten! http://www.simply.co.uk/kelkoo/47997...ters/index.htm |
|
|
|