NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > Software > Windows
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2005   #1 (permalink)
cybergibbons
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 15
Aircrack with multiple APS with same ESSID

I'm currently doing some penetration testing on a large wireless network. I already know the WEP key, it is 64-bit. The system used to use another WEP key, some of the APs and some of the clients do not know the new key (although this number is small).

I can see over 30 APs, which each have a low amount of traffic, but when you observe all of them, there is enough to make the collection of IVs using airodump OK without any aireplay attack (or the like). This traffic consists mainly of ARP requests, and some Windows networking stuff (seen using airdecap and the known key).

I captured about 1 million IVs as reported with aircrack, but I couldn't crack the key. I tried differing fudge factors and hinting the first few bytes, to no avail.

Because the traffic is over multiple BSSIDs, but with the same ESSID, I use the -e option with aircrack. I guessed that the data might have been poisoned by the APs and clients using the old key. I used airdecap with the old and new key, and found that a small but significant amount of the packets used the old key.

I then used tethereal to filter the captured data into data only (removing beacons and probes and non-encrypted data). Then I filtered out any traffic using the old key, using the BSSID and source addresses of clients. Because aircrack uses the unencrypted beacons with the ESSID, I then made a custom cap file with just beacons of the APs using the new key. Using the filtered data and beacon cap file, I then ran aircrack again.

Still the votes all look very similar, and it doesn't get any result, no matter the fudge factor or filter.

The wireless card and set-up works fine with single ESSID systems. Is this a problem with the -e option, or is all my mucking around ruining it?

At some point I will try using one AP and an attack to generate more traffic.
cybergibbons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005   #2 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by cybergibbons
The system used to use another WEP key, some of the APs and some of the clients do not know the new key (although this number is small).
And how does this fit into the mix?

Some of the APs don't know the new key?
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005   #3 (permalink)
cybergibbons
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrzwaldo
And how does this fit into the mix?

Some of the APs don't know the new key?
They are old 802.11b APs which have been "lost" and need reconfiguring.

The clients are PCs locked in offices which aren't accessible and can't be remotely administered/updated.
cybergibbons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005   #4 (permalink)
streaker69
Psychic Amish Stumbler
 
streaker69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 11,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by cybergibbons
They are old 802.11b APs which have been "lost" and need reconfiguring.

The clients are PCs locked in offices which aren't accessible and can't be remotely administered/updated.
I'm confused, what exactly are you trying to accomplish?
__________________
"One of these days, I'm going to cut you to pieces."

If you're offended by this post, please feel free to report it to one of the many helpful moderators of this forum.

Thank you.
streaker69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005   #5 (permalink)
cybergibbons
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by streaker69
I'm confused, what exactly are you trying to accomplish?
I'm trying to see if it would be possible to obtain the WEP key as an external party. I don't know if the problem is extra data, the fact I have played with the cap files, or if aircrack doesn't actually work with multiple APs with the same ESSID.
cybergibbons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005   #6 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,099
Are you sure that the APs' are using same key?

If they are in locked offices and aren't remotely configurable, what good is knowing the older key? If you can't configure it remotely, you probably can't configure them wirelessly.
__________________
Thorn
"I'm The Doctor. I'm a Time Lord. I am from the planet Gallifrey in the constellation Kasterborous. I'm 903 years old and I am the man who is going to save your lives and all 6 billion people on the planet below... You got a problem with that?"
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005   #7 (permalink)
cybergibbons
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorn
Are you sure that the APs' are using same key?

If they are in locked offices and aren't remotely configurable, what good is knowing the older key? If you can't configure it remotely, you probably can't configure them wirelessly.
Not all the APs are using the same key. However, I have filtered the cap file from airodump using tethereal so that it only contains the traffic from APs and clients using the new key. I can be sure of this because when I use airdecap with the old key, no packets are decrypted, and when I used it with the new key, all packets are decrypted.

I didn't make it clear - the locked up computers are only using the old key because they can't be accessed to be changed. They will at a point in the future be changed. But at the moment they are polluting the traffic.
cybergibbons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005   #8 (permalink)
Dutch
Humourless EuroMod.
 
Dutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Mermaids, Denmark
Posts: 6,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by cybergibbons
Not all the APs are using the same key. However, I have filtered the cap file from airodump using tethereal so that it only contains the traffic from APs and clients using the new key. I can be sure of this because when I use airdecap with the old key, no packets are decrypted, and when I used it with the new key, all packets are decrypted.

I didn't make it clear - the locked up computers are only using the old key because they can't be accessed to be changed. They will at a point in the future be changed. But at the moment they are polluting the traffic.
My left middletoe is itching under the nail.. That normally means something fishy is afoot (Pun intended).

Why can't those computers locations be accessed, if you are doing a Pen-test/WiFi survey for the company owning those computers?

When doing such a auditing project, it is normally in order to check and identify problems, and fix them. Are you telling me that there aren't anybody in the company you are doing the auditing for, that have access to all the locations where they have computers and AP's located ?

Dutch
__________________
All your answers are belong to Google. SEARCH DAMMIT!
Warning. Warning.
Low C8H10N4O2 level detected. Operator halted....
Dutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005   #9 (permalink)
cybergibbons
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch
Why can't those computers locations be accessed, if you are doing a Pen-test/WiFi survey for the company owning those computers?
The offices have physical locks on them installed by the person in the office, and we do not have the keys. There are also PCs in offices which are personal PCs, so we do not have admin rights on them. Everyone is on holiday at the moment apart from support staff.

I already have both the old and new WEP key, but I am unable to crack the new one using traffic I can gather. How would I have the key, and why would I care, if I was doing this illegally?

Nonetheless, is all that is needed to cause WEP cracking to fail is to inject a few packets here and there with the wrong key?

Last edited by cybergibbons : 08-22-2005 at 04:06 PM.
cybergibbons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005   #10 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,127
You do realize that WEP cracking is not absolute? There is a certain margin of uncertainty, or like I have seen mentioned "bad luck".
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005   #11 (permalink)
cybergibbons
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrzwaldo
You do realize that WEP cracking is not absolute? There is a certain margin of uncertainty, or like I have seen mentioned "bad luck".
I do realize that, but I would have thought with approx 800,000 IVs, a 64-bit key, and hinting at the first three bytes, I would have got it.

With 64-bit keys, I have seen as low as 50,000 but never more than 400,000 needed. But I have never tried using the ESSID before.
cybergibbons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2005   #12 (permalink)
Huzzy
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by cybergibbons
I do realize that, but I would have thought with approx 800,000 IVs, a 64-bit key, and hinting at the first three bytes, I would have got it.

With 64-bit keys, I have seen as low as 50,000 but never more than 400,000 needed. But I have never tried using the ESSID before.

Left field suggestion:

1) There may be a 3rd WEP key in use? though you would have noticed when filtering with ethereal.

2) What hardware are you using?
others will know better than me, but certain hardware/firmware that corrupts captured data is floating around.
Huzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2005   #13 (permalink)
cybergibbons
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huzzy
Left field suggestion:

1) There may be a 3rd WEP key in use? though you would have noticed when filtering with ethereal.

2) What hardware are you using?
others will know better than me, but certain hardware/firmware that corrupts captured data is floating around.
1. Yes, there was another WEP key in fact. This is from a wireless network installed by another company who chose to use the same channel and SSID without permission. We solved this by turning off their network, and asking them to change it.

2. For capture, initially I was using an Orinoco Gold Classic, with the Wildpeek drivers under Windows XP, and using the drivers that come as standard with the Auditor Linux Live CD. I captured traffic using both OS, and cracking using both versions of aircrack to see if it was one causing the problem.

Note, I got the source for the latest aircrack and compiled it under Auditor as the standard one is quite old.

I now have a D-link DWL-G650 Hardware Rev C3 Card (Atheros chipset). It seems to work well for capturing and injection in my own test set-ups, but again, the captures from the large multiple AP network don't result in a key being found.
cybergibbons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2005   #14 (permalink)
Huzzy
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by cybergibbons
1. Yes, there was another WEP key in fact. This is from a wireless network installed by another company who chose to use the same channel and SSID without permission. We solved this by turning off their network, and asking them to change it.

2. For capture, initially I was using an Orinoco Gold Classic, with the Wildpeek drivers under Windows XP, and using the drivers that come as standard with the Auditor Linux Live CD. I captured traffic using both OS, and cracking using both versions of aircrack to see if it was one causing the problem.

Note, I got the source for the latest aircrack and compiled it under Auditor as the standard one is quite old.

I now have a D-link DWL-G650 Hardware Rev C3 Card (Atheros chipset). It seems to work well for capturing and injection in my own test set-ups, but again, the captures from the large multiple AP network don't result in a key being found.


Elaborate on how that 3rd wep key/network is "shut down"?
Huzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2005   #15 (permalink)
cybergibbons
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huzzy
Elaborate on how that 3rd wep key/network is "shut down"?
Breaker panel, chose ring main, switch off.
cybergibbons is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.