![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 17
|
Howdy,
I've come out of lurk mode in hopes of obtaining some advice. ![]() I have an original Belkin F5D6020 (Ver.1) 802.11b PCMCIA card which I used to get a fair amount of use from on my old Win98 Thinkpad, but in an attempt to see how it holds up in my current VAIO to my new Intel mini-PCI card, I found I couldn't even install it. I get a Code 10 Device cannot Start in device manager when it's inserted. I had wondered if there could be an issue of the VAIO not supporting 16-bit cards (would be odd), but eventually ran across this article: http://www.experts-exchange.com/Hard..._21062798.html The symptoms match exactly, although I didn't follow through with the fix. I'm a little gunshy about impulsively applying a DIY registry fix for a card that is supposedly still supported. (Well, it's old, but this issue didn't just pop up yesterday either) As generically available as the WL-11000 is/was, I saw very little about this particular problem, short of that article. I don't see any other reports of the same issues coming up for some of the other rebranded versions either. I did a search here and only ran across this, but I'm not even sure that's a WL-11000, so that made me more uncertain. So, maybe I'm missing something. Are there are any other solutions to this problem, or was what I found a known, and accepted fix for this card under WinXP? Specs: Sony VAIO VGN-FS8900P3 Notebook: Pentium M 1.73Ghz Centrino, 512MB DDR2 PC2-4200 RAM, Intel 915 Chipset, Intel Pro 2200BG Mini-PCI card, WinXP Pro SP2. Eumitcom (Accton) WL-11000 rebranded as Belkin F5D6020 (Ver. 1) PCMCIA 16-bit card. FCC ID: K7SF5D6020 Thanks for any help. Last edited by Tholek : 12-27-2006 at 06:43 PM. Reason: Success! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Did you do the math?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,083
|
It could be that registry corruption is the issues, as it does happen. Another possibility is that the BIOS will intentionally not recognize the card. It is a known issue with some laptops that the BIOS will only talk to certain Mini-PCI cards. Usually, the BIOS is restricted to talking only to "branded" Mini-PCI cards sold by the manufacturer of the laptop. I haven't seen it in PCMCIA cards, but it could be a problem.
I've also had some cards not recognized by some systems no matter what you do. Usually the older the card and the older the system, the more common the problem.
__________________
Thorn "I'm The Doctor. I'm a Time Lord. I am from the planet Gallifrey in the constellation Kasterborous. I'm 903 years old and I am the man who is going to save your lives and all 6 billion people on the planet below... You got a problem with that?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 17
|
Thanks for getting back to me, Thorn.
![]() Registry corruption is always possible, although this isn't that old of an install. I got this laptop pretty recently. I've also heard of the BIOS issue you speak of. Only a few weeks ago, I read about a workaround for an Atheros upgrade on a Thinkpad on thinkpads.com's forum. A hack was necessary to do it. Likewise,though, I've never heard of this in relation to PCMCIA cards. I'd sooner expect that on old laptops with proprietary PCMCIA interfaces. (I have an old external floppy like that that works with nothing else but an old Compaq) As for the system, it's no Core Duo, but again, pretty recent. The card is probably around 4 years old, since it sold with XP drivers. I'd be surprised if it was no longer supportable. As the article said, this doesn't seem to be an hardware issue, but software, and XP being the likely culprit. I'd like to wait a couple of days for some more input, but in your opinion, does that registry hack seem worthwhile? I'm not a security expert, and can't see the possible outcomes of changing those permissions. I'll take an educated guess at the least. ![]() Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Did you do the math?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,083
|
Quote:
In general, the biggest problem with a Registry edit isn't that you lose or gain security (although that may be an issue), but rather that you screw up the Registry completely. The simple solution to that is simply copy the Registry .dat files before the edit. Then, if you screw it up, or the edit doesn't have the desire results, you copy the .dat files back, and you're no worse than when you started. There are plenty of sites out there describing the backup procedure. Making an "XP Restore Point" is probably the easiest way to do it.
__________________
Thorn "I'm The Doctor. I'm a Time Lord. I am from the planet Gallifrey in the constellation Kasterborous. I'm 903 years old and I am the man who is going to save your lives and all 6 billion people on the planet below... You got a problem with that?" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Psychic Amish Stumbler
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 11,790
|
The registry is not as scary as a place to play in as everyone would make it seem to be. I've done hundreds of edits across dozens of machines over the years and have not had one bad issue yet.
If a site gives you exactly what key to change, no biggie, just go change it. It isn't like that one key related to your NIC is going to cause your entire machine to self destruct. Now there are certain areas you don't want to go into unless you know exactly what you're doing, but making one or two changes to a driver configuration ain't gonna hurt nuttin'.
__________________
"One of these days, I'm going to cut you to pieces." If you're offended by this post, please feel free to report it to one of the many helpful moderators of this forum. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||||
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
My apologies. I had been viewing a cached version: http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache..._21062798.html You have to scroll to the bottom of the page for the replies. That's where I saw (via a Google search) that someone reported these symptoms in relation to my card. (SoccerSam16) Enlade lays out the fix, and WooDaddy tweaks it appropriately. It sounds good, but I've not done that kind of regedit before. Mine have (on my desktop) been all for changing icons and drive names. What's your take on that? Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() In case it disappears somehow, here's the relevant part I had referred to: Quote:
Last edited by Tholek : 12-27-2006 at 03:16 PM. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Did you do the math?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,083
|
If you edit it so that only the Administrator or the Administrator's Group has the option to run, it should be OK. Given Everyone permission has the potential for disaster.
__________________
Thorn "I'm The Doctor. I'm a Time Lord. I am from the planet Gallifrey in the constellation Kasterborous. I'm 903 years old and I am the man who is going to save your lives and all 6 billion people on the planet below... You got a problem with that?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Humourless EuroMod.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Mermaids, Denmark
Posts: 6,813
|
Quote:
![]() Dutch
__________________
All your answers are belong to Google. SEARCH DAMMIT! Warning. Warning. Low C8H10N4O2 level detected. Operator halted.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 17
|
LOL, it worked. Spread the word to all the WL-11000 owners across the land.
![]() The problem is, I don't know which part worked. I granted permission to SYSTEM and Adminstrator, and on PCI as well as PCMCIA. Hmm, might regret that one day, but all is well now. The reception is awful compared to my mini-pci card with its dual antenna leads, but it does work. I now have a backup. Might get around to finally soldering that RP-SMA jack on there, to boot. (I hear the groans already) ![]() Thanks for the kick in the butt. |
|
|
|