NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > Software > Windows
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2005   #1 (permalink)
goodnetwork
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
What is the best encryption

Hi guys,

I am installing my wireless system with DLINK 54 mbs AP and I am wondering which is the best encryption ?

Is it WPA ? If it is, should I make a 128bit encryption or 256bit encryption ? Does it slow done the network to have a 256bit ?
goodnetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2005   #2 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,099
The question is too generic. Best encryption for what purpose? General WiFi? Other questions which come into play: What Operating System(s)? Home, SOHO, Forturne 500 business, or mil-spec use?

Assumng for the moment that it's just Home/SOHO use, that you're using Windows and that all your equipment supports it, then yes, WPA would be the best choice.

By the way, you posted this in the NetStumble Forum ("NetStumbler: Questions and configuration information about the NetStumbler software".)This question has nothing to do with NetStumbler, and should be in one of the more general areas such as Windows or Unix/Linx.
__________________
Thorn
"I'm The Doctor. I'm a Time Lord. I am from the planet Gallifrey in the constellation Kasterborous. I'm 903 years old and I am the man who is going to save your lives and all 6 billion people on the planet below... You got a problem with that?"

Last edited by Thorn : 01-21-2005 at 07:14 AM. Reason: typos
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2005   #3 (permalink)
nashr
Uber Geek
 
nashr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by goodnetwork
Hi guys,

I am installing my wireless system with DLINK 54 mbs AP and I am wondering which is the best encryption ?

Is it WPA ? If it is, should I make a 128bit encryption or 256bit encryption ? Does it slow done the network to have a 256bit ?
Being an old-timer like Thorn I still prefer good old ROT13. Unfortunately I haven't found a good wifi implemention of this. Has anyone encountered a good product using this?
__________________
Help! I've been Simpsonized!
nashr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2005   #4 (permalink)
scdako
Geek
 
scdako's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St. Thomas/ Ontario/ Canada
Posts: 63
I don't understand why (unless you have very sensitive data or whatever) if you have just a basic home network to share internet, files, printers, etc. why everyone is concerned with what encryption is best. In my opinion as long as you have some encryption no body is going to try and hack into it, because there is likely lots more around that are unsequred. Why would anyone want to hack your encrypted connection when there is lots around that are unecrypted unless they just want to do it for thrills, but even then whats the chances they pick yours. Put any encryption on and in my opinion your connection should be safe.
this is just my take on things, someone else might disagree.
scdako is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2005   #5 (permalink)
goodnetwork
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Thanks all of you for your comment.

I got a Wireless AP Dlink 54mbs and 2 laptops and 1 normal computer. All should be connected on the wireless and I just want that a kid of the building try to hack my personal file for fun as it can be easily done these days.

I agree with u scdako but the risk that somebody use all my internet bandwith or use my private files (bank etc.) is very low but this is something I dont want to take the risk.
I guess WPA is the best but what about the amounts of bits, 64, 128 or 256bits ?

Should it take more time to break a network of 256 bits than a 128 bits ? Do I loose any speed with the 256 bits.

Sorry to put this post in Netstumbler, can somebody move it to Windows ?

Last edited by goodnetwork : 01-24-2005 at 02:23 AM.
goodnetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2005   #6 (permalink)
goodnetwork
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Any idea what I should knowing that I care much about security ?
goodnetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2005   #7 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,099
Quote:
Originally Posted by goodnetwork
Any idea what I should knowing that I care much about security ?
Look here: FAQ: WiFi Security
__________________
Thorn
"I'm The Doctor. I'm a Time Lord. I am from the planet Gallifrey in the constellation Kasterborous. I'm 903 years old and I am the man who is going to save your lives and all 6 billion people on the planet below... You got a problem with that?"
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2005   #8 (permalink)
goodnetwork
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Always use encryption (WEP or WPA) on your wireless network. If possible, use a 128-bit or higher variation.
* Whenever possible, use additional encryption such as SSL or VPN.

It does not say if it slow down the network... Can u pls help ?

How long does somebody takes to brake in a 128bit network ? Longer than on a 64 bits ?
goodnetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2005   #9 (permalink)
rjdenver
Registered Member
 
rjdenver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by goodnetwork
Always use encryption (WEP or WPA) on your wireless network. If possible, use a 128-bit or higher variation.
* Whenever possible, use additional encryption such as SSL or VPN.

It does not say if it slow down the network... Can u pls help ?

How long does somebody takes to brake in a 128bit network ? Longer than on a 64 bits ?
Seems to depend on the method used to encrypt, the method used to break, and luck.

WEP, with its weaknesses, takes less time to break than WPA. My own experience was that WEP 128 took 3 hours, whille 64 took 5 seconds. But that was after generating 8 hours worth of traffic.

Given the 'luck' factor, I'm not sure you can make a definitive statement - except that none of these is ever 100% secure.

RjDenver
rjdenver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2005   #10 (permalink)
goodnetwork
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Ok... This means that I will encrypt with 256 bits because really 3 hours + 8 hours is really nothing !!! Too dangerous as I share the file over the network.

How can somebody get this 500k of packets in only 8 hours ??? This is very fast no ? I heard it takes days to have 500k of packets.
goodnetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2005   #11 (permalink)
rjdenver
Registered Member
 
rjdenver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by goodnetwork
Ok... This means that I will encrypt with 256 bits because really 3 hours + 8 hours is really nothing !!! Too dangerous as I share the file over the network.

How can somebody get this 500k of packets in only 8 hours ??? This is very fast no ? I heard it takes days to have 500k of packets.
My tests are probably pretty unrealistic for real-life, and were more academic for my own interests. I did this on my own network, so I could dedicate processes to generating all that traffic local to me. If someone is just browsing the sports news in the evenings, it could be weeks before generating all the traffic that would make the most common attacks practical. You could frustrate those even more by changing the keys before too much traffic was generated.

RjDenver
rjdenver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2005   #12 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by goodnetwork
Ok... This means that I will encrypt with 256 bits because really 3 hours + 8 hours is really nothing !!! Too dangerous as I share the file over the network.

How can somebody get this 500k of packets in only 8 hours ??? This is very fast no ? I heard it takes days to have 500k of packets.
I suppose some type of packet injection would do the trick...
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2005   #13 (permalink)
goodnetwork
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Start to be interesting... How would u do to inject packets in the Wireless network ?
goodnetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2005   #14 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by goodnetwork
Start to be interesting... How would u do to inject packets in the Wireless network ?
Sorry that's all the further I'm going with it.
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2005   #15 (permalink)
goodnetwork
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Ok no prob.

I think I will do the test this WE.

I will do a 64 bit encryption and try to crack it in just a WE.
goodnetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.