![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#212 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5
|
Hi,
I'm running airodump/aircrack on an orinoco oem without problems, really good work But I have problems with a prism based pci card. I'm using the hostap driver version 0.2.4. When I start airodump, I just get the status bar (essid etc.) but nothing else. The cursor runs from left to right, that's all. I have to terminate airodump with ctrl+c. Then I get a segmentation fault. I set the monitor mode as follows: iwconfig wlan0 mode Monitor channel 9 iwpriv wlan0 monitor_type 1 Capturing with kismet works fine. So I don't think the driver or the firmware is the reason. Any ideas? Thanks in advance. madjerk |
|
|
|
|
#213 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1
|
aircrack & wepcrack
I've been testing various WEP cracking tools -- set up an AP and a few laptops to move traffic while one sniffs. I've seen excellent results from wepcrack -- cracks a 64-bit WEP key in under a second -- with or without a word list. Aircrack seems much slower -- takes 10 minutes or more (this is all using over a packetfile of over 10k packets).
Is anyone familiar enough with the these two to understand why wepcrack seems so much faster? Haven't been able to get wepattack to work poperly to see how it compares. |
|
|
|
|
#214 (permalink) |
|
Emergence
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 389
|
Aircrack seems much slower -- takes 10 minutes or more (this is all using over a packetfile of over 10k packets).
You can't crack WEP using a statistical attack with so few packets. For 64-bit WEP you'll need around 100k IVs. Otherwise you're doing it by brute force. |
|
|
|
|
#215 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
|
Packet Injecting.
Hey Devine. Just wanted to tell you again that I think your program is amazing. I was able to get a key in a matter of 30 minutes or so. (The guy was moving tons of traffic through the network.)
My question for you though is... packet injecting. I've been testing this out but can't seem to get any IV's to generate from using this. Maybe i'm just not using it correctly. What is a good packet injecting program for linux? Packit is pretty cool, that's what i've been using. What kind of packet do you have to inject to generate iv's? I've tried ARP and TCP. Bah, help me out man! |
|
|
|
|
#220 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2
|
'lo,
thx for the answer. it was a bit stupid to ask you with this question because first: if i had read the read-me file, the answer of me Q were in it And two because the day of my Q, i've try it on my AP (128bits) and he find the key after 7sec of search and 2hours of capture (1000000 IVs, imagine i was downloading a 1Go file from pc-to-pc in my lan !! lol) anyway, thx ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#223 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1
|
Using airodump the normal way. Not creating traffic and no packet injection. As software using Slackware 10.1 and not patched hostap drivers. As hardware Senao prism 2.5 with two pigtails.
The setup gave me in the first hour 64975 IVs with around 200k of packets. Two days later I'm around the 1000k of packets and still 64975 IVs. Is this normal. Can anyone tell me what the prob could be? |
|
|
|
|
#224 (permalink) |
|
Drunken Stumbler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Anywhere but Utah
Posts: 1,803
|
Odd behaviour
Just trying to crack a test setup here at the office.
AP is a WRT54G, latest firmware, and a client was a Linksys Wireless B webcam, also latest firmware (lotsa traffic) Setup for 128 Bit WEP, Captured varying amounts of packets and ran the crack. 2 Interesting things I noticed: 1. When Airodump is collecting packets, it says that the packets it is collecting are WPA encoded (I am sure they are WEP only) 2. 100K, 250K, 600K packets: No amount seems to get past the 12th KB in the crack. (I know it's not an exact science) I'm curious if anyone else has noticed this, or if the newer firmwares are doing something tricky.
__________________
Never drink anything larger than your head! Scaramental Wine Taster for the Church Of WiFi Buy our books! "I reject your reality, and substitute my own!" – Adam Savage CoWF WPA Hash Tables |
|
|
|
|
#225 (permalink) |
|
Emergence
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 389
|
1. When Airodump is collecting packets, it says that the packets it is collecting are WPA encoded (I am sure they are WEP only)
Yeah. known bug. 2. 100K, 250K, 600K packets: No amount seems to get past the 12th KB in the crack. (I know it's not an exact science) 128 bit WEP = 3 bytes IV + 13 bytes key. Aircrack actually computes votes for the 13th keybyte but the info disappears just after being printed. Deftronic: it is normal, you're capturing beacons (unencrypted frames sent by the AP to make itself known). |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|