NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > Software > Unix/Linux
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-22-2004   #226 (permalink)
renderman
Drunken Stumbler
 
renderman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Anywhere but Utah
Posts: 1,803
Quote:
Originally Posted by devine
1. When Airodump is collecting packets, it says that the packets it is collecting are WPA encoded (I am sure they are WEP only)

Yeah. known bug.

2. 100K, 250K, 600K packets: No amount seems to get past the 12th KB in the crack. (I know it's not an exact science)

128 bit WEP = 3 bytes IV + 13 bytes key. Aircrack actually computes votes for the 13th keybyte but the info disappears just after being printed.

Deftronic: it is normal, you're capturing beacons (unencrypted frames sent by the AP to make itself known).
Ah, OK, I'm not crazy.

Still have'nt been able to crack it, need to fiddle with the data coming across and get some better packets.

Thanks Devine
renderman is offline  
Old 12-30-2004   #227 (permalink)
2marshall8
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 14
I see version 2.1 on the aircrack site. Is this the final version of Aircrack being released? Has this worked out all the bugs? Devine what kind of setup do you need to increase packet generation using Aireplay? I'm planning on buying a Senao NL-2511 CD Plus EXT2 and wondered if I can use this card to Multiply packets and sniff them in order to increase IV capture? This card has the two antennas so I wasn't sure how possible that was.

thanks
marshall
2marshall8 is offline  
Old 01-12-2005   #228 (permalink)
baskin
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1
Although Senao NL-2511 CD Plus EXT2 works perfect with aircrack, you will need two cards to increase packet generation from the AP. You need one card to inject ARP packets and another one to sniff. The two antennas work in diversity mode. That means that they can not be used each one for different applications.
baskin is offline  
Old 01-30-2005   #229 (permalink)
Re@liTy
Registered Member
 
Re@liTy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brighton - U.K.
Posts: 65
Can anyone tell me what the "PWR" column in Airodump is actually reporting??
Please don't say "PoWeR" !! Of what !?!? In what unit of measurement?
I mean *exactly* to what does the figure reported pertain??

(with some cards i get "-1" & some give "216" etc)

Thanks.
__________________
I started out with nothing..............and I've still got most of it left.....
Re@liTy is offline  
Old 01-30-2005   #230 (permalink)
devine
Emergence
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Re@liTy
Can anyone tell me what the "PWR" column in Airodump is actually reporting?? Please don't say "PoWeR" !! Of what !?!? In what unit of measurement? I mean *exactly* to what does the figure reported pertain??
I have no idea. It's the signal power reported by your wireless driver. Could be anything (dB, mw, ...). Read the driver source if available, disassemble the firmware, or ask the person who wrote it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Re@liTy
(with some cards i get "-1"
This means your wireless driver does not give out signal power information. If you use hostap, try "iwpriv wlan0 monitor_type 1" to enable the prism2 header.
devine is offline  
Old 02-07-2005   #231 (permalink)
warp_be
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1
Does aircrack finds itself the n bits for WEP key ?

If i launch aircrack without specifying the number of bits of the key (by default 12 i think) ,
does it find it itself,
or do i have to force the number of bits before lauching aircrakc ?
warp_be is offline  
Old 02-07-2005   #232 (permalink)
sylvain
Wireless Auditor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 175
contrary to weplab, you do not have to specify the key length
sylvain is offline  
Old 03-21-2005   #233 (permalink)
seboslaw
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3
no output in aircrack

Hey,

when I start aircrack in a console under linux with

aircrack test.cap

all I get is an empty console screen. There is no output whatsoever. Is the -q option enabled by default now? When I do a "top" I can see that aircrack is running with 99% CPU. What's wrong?

Regards,

Sebastian

Last edited by seboslaw : 03-21-2005 at 08:45 AM.
seboslaw is offline  
Old 03-22-2005   #234 (permalink)
_metro_
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by seboslaw
when I start aircrack in a console under linux with
aircrack test.cap

all I get is an empty console screen. There is no output whatsoever. Is the -q option enabled by default now? When I do a "top" I can see that aircrack is running with 99% CPU. What's wrong?
Just add the -q 3 to see full details, or -q 2, or -q 1
_metro_ is offline  
Old 05-03-2005   #235 (permalink)
renderman
Drunken Stumbler
 
renderman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Anywhere but Utah
Posts: 1,803
Crappy keys?

Did a presentation last night showing off several wireless tools including Aircrack (the gasps at a 2 second crack were alot of fun, thanks Devine!)

Had one question that got me thinking.

The person had asked if Aircrack would shortcut and check if someone had punched in a really crappy manual key. ie. 12:34:56:78:90 or 11:11:11:11:11, etc.

Since there's no real way for the program to know to 'guess' those keys, they would take as long as normal.

Got me thinking that perhaps Aircrack 2.2 should have a switch to run against a dictionary of test keys first, before going about the brute force. Perhaps shortcutting the need for X number of IV's.

Just a thought.
renderman is offline  
Old 05-03-2005   #236 (permalink)
streaker69
Psychic Amish Stumbler
 
streaker69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 11,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by renderman
Did a presentation last night showing off several wireless tools including Aircrack (the gasps at a 2 second crack were alot of fun, thanks Devine!)

Had one question that got me thinking.

The person had asked if Aircrack would shortcut and check if someone had punched in a really crappy manual key. ie. 12:34:56:78:90 or 11:11:11:11:11, etc.

Since there's no real way for the program to know to 'guess' those keys, they would take as long as normal.

Got me thinking that perhaps Aircrack 2.2 should have a switch to run against a dictionary of test keys first, before going about the brute force. Perhaps shortcutting the need for X number of IV's.

Just a thought.
Are you channeling newbs?

http://www.netstumbler.org/showthrea...830#post118830
__________________
"One of these days, I'm going to cut you to pieces."

If you're offended by this post, please feel free to report it to one of the many helpful moderators of this forum.

Thank you.
streaker69 is offline  
Old 06-18-2005   #237 (permalink)
CobraGT2000
Registered Member
 
CobraGT2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: KC, Mo
Posts: 8
Prism Types

Just wonder "ddin't see it in the thread tho" but can you use aircrack, airoplay and airodump with the Prism 2.5 and 3 type cards? Thanks.
CobraGT2000 is offline  
Old 06-23-2005   #238 (permalink)
devine
Emergence
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by renderman
Did a presentation last night showing off several wireless tools including Aircrack (the gasps at a 2 second crack were alot of fun, thanks Devine!)
You're welcome.

One a side note, I released a preliminary beta version of aircrack 2.2. It's available at http://www.cr0.net:8040/code/network/

Quote:
Originally Posted by renderman
Got me thinking that perhaps Aircrack 2.2 should have a switch to run against a dictionary of test keys first, before going about the brute force. Perhaps shortcutting the need for X number of IV's.
Sure, I'll think about it.
devine is offline  
Old 06-24-2005   #239 (permalink)
_metro_
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by devine
One a side note, I released a preliminary beta version of aircrack 2.2. It's available at http://www.cr0.net:8040/code/network/
Excellent version!
The prompt for the target network, identification of WPA/WEP, # of IVs works great!

The WPA cracking seems to work fine, i'd made a small WPA-pcap file just for fun and then found the test/wpa.cap there. Nice touch.

Just curious abour the w32 gui that you mentioned early, there's any screenshot to peek?

Again, thks a lot for this excellent app!
_metro_ is offline  
Old 06-26-2005   #240 (permalink)
devine
Emergence
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by _metro_
Excellent version!
The prompt for the target network, identification of WPA/WEP, # of IVs works great! The WPA cracking seems to work fine, i'd made a small WPA-pcap file just for fun and then found the test/wpa.cap there. Nice touch.
Thanks! Also, the WPA cracking code is about 4 times faster than cowpatty on x86 hardware, thanks to a fine tuned SHA-1 MMX implementation. By the way, I've left a couple of easter eggs in the aircrack source code

Quote:
Originally Posted by _metro_
Just curious abour the w32 gui that you mentioned early, there's any screenshot to peek?
As of now, I haven't started hacking the Win32 code. I'm rather focusing on fully automating the attacks in aireplay, especially the ARP replay attack. The basic idea is, for each captured ARP request, to resend it and check if it generates some IVs - if not, try another ARP request, etc. This way, no user intervention at all is required.

Here's a summary of the attacks that are being implemented:

Code:
"      -0 delay  : deauthenticate all stations\n"
"      -1 essid  : fake authentication with AP\n"
"      -2        : interactive frame selection\n"
"      -3        : standard ARP-request replay\n"
"      -4        : decrypt/chopchop WEP packet\n"
About the Win32 GUI, I guess I'll just use the MFC. It should be a good compromise between portability and simplicity of the code

(And before someone asks again, there will not be a port of aireplay on Windows -- because the WildPackets driver doesn't support injection, and I don't have the time or skills to develop an Atheros/Prism2/Prism54 WDM driver).
devine is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.