NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > Software > Unix/Linux
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2004   #121 (permalink)
sylvain
Wireless Auditor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoreK
From Abaddon's FAQ:

I did not look at the cisco driver. Maybe later.

what does "I am under NDA" mean ?
sylvain is offline  
Old 08-26-2004   #122 (permalink)
KoreK
Banned in DC
 
KoreK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 102
NDA = Non disclosure agreement
KoreK is offline  
Old 08-26-2004   #123 (permalink)
sylvain
Wireless Auditor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 175
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by KoreK
NDA = Non disclosure agreement
ok ... so that I would be glad if you can look at the cisco drivers Korek without being under NDA ;-)
sylvain is offline  
Old 08-26-2004   #124 (permalink)
sylvain
Wireless Auditor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 175
Moreover I found an interesting article about packet reinjection..it is quite old but interesting (based on Prism2 cards)..it deals with libradiate.
http://www.packetfactory.net/project...oolkit-2.0.pdf


in the same style there is File2Air which uses AirJack Drivers...

more informations about these tools : http://downloads.wireless-kit.com/ especially the wireless-specific encryption cracking part...

Last edited by sylvain : 08-26-2004 at 09:17 AM.
sylvain is offline  
Old 08-26-2004   #125 (permalink)
devine
Emergence
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoreK
Based on Abaddon's driver (and rma0251.pdf, google for it), it wasn't very difficult to patch wlan-ng to send raw 802.11 frame in monitor mode. I had a quick look at the hostap driver and the following patch (against 0.2.0) should put the chipset in a more receptive mood.
Just tried it, doesn't work too well The damn chipset still trashed the 802.11 header. I tried googling for rma0251, but got no results.
devine is offline  
Old 08-26-2004   #126 (permalink)
KoreK
Banned in DC
 
KoreK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 102
It's rm0251.pdf, sorry. I guess I'll have to install hostap and tinker a bit.
KoreK is offline  
Old 08-26-2004   #127 (permalink)
sylvain
Wireless Auditor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by topolb
Not answered by windows machine? are you sure? Windows always answer icmp echo-request if it is directly sent to it and there is not any firewall blocking.

What windows are not used to answer is icmp echo-requests directed to broadcast.

As far as I know sylvain suggestion of spoofing icmp requests should work
and I think this tool implement already this kind of attacks .. http://sourceforge.net/projects/wepwedgie/

could be great to add this to weplab or aircrack ... :-)
sylvain is offline  
Old 08-28-2004   #128 (permalink)
stbstb
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7
hello
what is "usable packets" in you realization?
in other words how i must filter 'em in capture not making a huge pointless capture files? what are the rules?
thanks
stbstb is offline  
Old 08-29-2004   #129 (permalink)
devine
Emergence
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by stbstb
what is "usable packets" in you realization? in other words how i must filter 'em in capture not making a huge pointless capture files? what are the rules?
thanks
Usable packets are encrypted data packets that match your BSSID/KeyID, and thus can be used by the cryptanalysis process. Indeed, when re-writing airodump I forgot the -e option (only log encrypted data packets), this will be fixed in the next release.
devine is offline  
Old 08-29-2004   #130 (permalink)
topolb
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by stbstb
hello
what is "usable packets" in you realization?
in other words how i must filter 'em in capture not making a huge pointless capture files? what are the rules?
thanks

As a "tip", if you do not want an huge logfile you can just log the first bytes of each encrypted data packet (let's say 80 bytes). This way you will save space and statistical attacks will still work as they only use 802.11 header and few bytes of the payload.

Anyway... harddrive space is cheap... who care!
topolb is offline  
Old 08-30-2004   #131 (permalink)
stbstb
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7
and maybe add -i key (information) to display all the bssids in capture file with the number of usable packets for each bssid and keyid
stbstb is offline  
Old 09-04-2004   #132 (permalink)
bigbadbaugh
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 25
Hi there


Can anyone give me any tips on using Aircrack.

I am currently capturing packets using Kismet trying to break my own 64BIT WEP.

Using the kismet dump file, i just used #aircrack /kismet.dump

and it stated there were 189 Unique ID's. This came from about 20,000 total packets in kismet.

Aircrack began cracking but my laptop battery ran out after about 20minutes.

I havnt tried since cause im capturing more packets again.


My questions are:

How many total packets, and then unique ID's are ruffly needed to break WEP ?

Is Air crack best used with Kismet or this Airodump im hearing people talking about ?

Is there any options I should specifiy when I run Aircrack to make it more efficent/reliable/better ?

Finally, what were the chances of breaking WEP with my original 189 Unique ID's if my Laptop battery hadnt run out ?



I hope you can answer these as it would definatly put me on the right tracks.

Cheers again
bigbadbaugh is offline  
Old 09-04-2004   #133 (permalink)
sylvain
Wireless Auditor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 175
you need 500,000 unique IV's that means 500 000 encrypted data packets...so you have to generate packets (see the other thread..)
aircrack works the same with files from kismet or airodump.
no option really needed at the beginning..
with 189 unique IV's , O chance to break it ..you need 500, 000
sylvain is offline  
Old 09-04-2004   #134 (permalink)
bigbadbaugh
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 25
Thanks for that.

If I need 500,000 Unique IV's, how many total packets does that ruffly work out as ?


Im guessing its got to be a few million to say the least ?


Just trying to caclulate how long its gonna take to crack my WEP with 1 single client connected. Any ideas ?


Thanks
bigbadbaugh is offline  
Old 09-04-2004   #135 (permalink)
sylvain
Wireless Auditor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbadbaugh
Thanks for that.

If I need 500,000 Unique IV's, how many total packets does that ruffly work out as ?


Im guessing its got to be a few million to say the least ?


Just trying to caclulate how long its gonna take to crack my WEP with 1 single client connected. Any ideas ?


Thanks
if you make ping -f -s 0 IP adress of the AP from the client it should take 10 minutes
sylvain is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.