NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > Software > Unix/Linux
Reload this Page Atheros AR5001X+ VS RALINK RT2500
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-2007   #1 (permalink)
Fernando Hiagon
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Atheros AR5001X+ VS RALINK RT2500
Hi all,
I am brazillian and sorry about my very poor english.
I have 2 pcmcia cards here, one with atheros AR5001X+ chipset called Warpstar WL54AG and another with RAlink RT2500 chipset called Corega WLCD54GL. Well, i can do airodump and aireplay without any troubble with both cards. Packet injection is ok too. BUT, with RAlink RT2500, i can get 15000IV/min while with atheros AR5001X+ i can get only 3500IV/min. Anybody can help me understant this ? Is RT2500 chipset better and more fast to do packet injection than Atheros chipset ?

RT2500 im using serialmonkey driver
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

atheros AR5001X+ im using madwifi drivers

Thanks for any help guys
Fernando Hiagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007   #2 (permalink)
itsnotme
Dumbass checker
 
itsnotme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Somewhere below Lake Ontario
Posts: 1,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fernando Hiagon
Hi all,
I am brazillian and sorry about my very poor english.
I have 2 pcmcia cards here, one with atheros AR5001X+ chipset called Warpstar WL54AG and another with RAlink RT2500 chipset called Corega WLCD54GL. Well, i can do airodump and aireplay without any troubble with both cards. Packet injection is ok too. BUT, with RAlink RT2500, i can get 15000IV/min while with atheros AR5001X+ i can get only 3500IV/min. Anybody can help me understant this ? Is RT2500 chipset better and more fast to do packet injection than Atheros chipset ?

RT2500 im using serialmonkey driver
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

atheros AR5001X+ im using madwifi drivers

Thanks for any help guys
Why does it matter? If the RAlink does what you need it to do faster, then use it.
itsnotme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007   #3 (permalink)
Fernando Hiagon
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Thanks itsnotme for you answer.
I wanna now why because my atheros card have external antenna, and i wanna use it instead Ralink one.

Tnx
Fernando Hiagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007   #4 (permalink)
Barry
Managing the iTards.
 
Barry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,383
WTF is wanna and Tnx??
__________________
Atheism is a non-prophet organization.
Barry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007   #5 (permalink)
Dutch
Humourless EuroMod.
 
Dutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Mermaids, Denmark
Posts: 6,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fernando Hiagon
Thanks itsnotme for you answer.
I wanna now why because my atheros card have external antenna, and i wanna use it instead Ralink one.

Tnx
You better read ALL the posts in the Welcome Desk section right now, and pay particular note to the thread regarding the usage of proper written english language on this forum, or your future posts will end up in an appropriate thread down in the Newbie Bin.

As for your question, it depends on the driver and the manufacturers implementation of the logic on the card, and how fast it can switch the chipset between different modes. Appearently the Ralink driver can do that faster with your Ralink based card, than the madwifi driver can do it with your Atheros based card. Although it doesn't necessarily help you, since it also depends on how fast the AP can respond, and if the data reported by the card and driver is valid.

Dutch
__________________
All your answers are belong to Google. SEARCH DAMMIT!
Warning. Warning.
Low C8H10N4O2 level detected. Operator halted....
Dutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007   #6 (permalink)
Fernando Hiagon
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Ok,
i think you guys need cooperate with me, because im still learn english here
Anyway, i read something about madwifi patch for monitor mode. This is the way to improve arp request speed ?
Thanks again

PS. one more time, sorry if i offend somebody here because my bad english.
Fernando Hiagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007   #7 (permalink)
theprez98
SpoonfeederExtraordinaire
 
theprez98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fernando Hiagon
Ok,
i think you guys need cooperate with me, because im still learn english here
Anyway, i read something about madwifi patch for monitor mode. This is the way to improve arp request speed ?
Thanks again

PS. one more time, sorry if i offend somebody here because my bad english.
I'm assuming they use capital letters in your native language.
__________________
:00475160 0E A6 AE A0 19 E3 A3 46 .......F
:00475168 0D 65 17 0C 53 70 6F 6F .e..Spoo
:00475170 6E 66 65 65 64 65 72 2E nfeeder.
:00475178 45 78 74 72 61 6F 72 64 Extraord
:00475180 69 6E 61 69 72 65 5D 3B inaire];
:00475188 8B 9E 92 5A FF 5D A6 F0 ...Z.]..
theprez98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007   #8 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fernando Hiagon
Ok,
i think you guys need cooperate with me, because im still learn english here
Anyway, i read something about madwifi patch for monitor mode. This is the way to improve arp request speed ?
Thanks again

PS. one more time, sorry if i offend somebody here because my bad english.
It could be the drivers.
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« problem connecting to Linksys WCG200v2-CC with wpa_supplicant and ndiswrapper | Kiswin32 - Kismet for windows in a can! »

Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:38 AM.

Contact Us - NetStumbler.org - NetStumbler.com - Online Backup - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.