![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18
|
Nemesis
Anyone thought of a way or figured out a way to use nemesis to create custom packets designed to produce weak IVs?
I ask because I was using Cain & Abel over wireless while connected on my desktop and while monitoring using my laptop I discovered that using Cain to search MACs on the subnet that it created an ENORMOUS flood of new weak IVs and interesting packets. Now I'm assuming its an ARP request of some sort... instead of hitting the Search button over and over, I'd rather run a script that incorporates nemesis. I also heard TCP SYN packets do the job... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
Note that classic "weak" IV's (e.g. B+3:FF:n) are of little value anymore, since KoreK's attacks in Aircrack/WepLab/Airsnort make use of a much broader range of IV's. Any packets you produce on the network will generate suitable IV's for these tools. -Josh
__________________
-Joshua Wright jwright@hasborg.com http://home.jwu.edu/jwright/ Today I stumbled across the world's largest hotspot. The SSID is "linksys". Check out the SANS advanced wireless auditing and assessment course: Los Angeles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18
|
Confused... help me understand this.
Network traffic aka packets going back and forth over the wireless network are encrypted and contain weak IVs (correct?) So whats the difference between a person who is downloading a couple huge movies or just submitting a bunch of packets through nemesis from within the network? I find it hard to believe theres no way to simulate a crap load of traffic. I am missing something? Am I not clear? This makes perfect sense in my head. The more traffic, the more encrypted packets, the more weak IVs. Cain and Abel (when using the search function) shoots a crap load of ARP packets everywhere... can't I just replicate the packet its sending? Last edited by syst0lic : 02-09-2005 at 12:00 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
![]() -Josh
__________________
-Joshua Wright jwright@hasborg.com http://home.jwu.edu/jwright/ Today I stumbled across the world's largest hotspot. The SSID is "linksys". Check out the SANS advanced wireless auditing and assessment course: Los Angeles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
Quote:
Of course, you have to already be associated to the network to make this happen, which makes it less valuable as a pen-test technique against WEP networks. I hope that clears this up. -Josh
__________________
-Joshua Wright jwright@hasborg.com http://home.jwu.edu/jwright/ Today I stumbled across the world's largest hotspot. The SSID is "linksys". Check out the SANS advanced wireless auditing and assessment course: Los Angeles |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Geek
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,615
|
Quote:
Where you @ Dr3D1zzl3? I work downtown near Archives/Navy Memorial Metro.
__________________
Help! I've been Simpsonized! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18
|
Yea that was the mess up.. the word weak.. using it when I shouldn't have.
I am associated to the network, because it is mine. I want to generate a crap load of IVs so I can crack my WEP key and use it as an example in a presentation I have to do at school on network security. Although you did clear something up for me and that is there is no way to MAKE a certain weak IV appear. Would be nice wouldn't it ![]() What tools are available for bruteforcing WEP? Not dictionary cracking.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Wireless Auditor
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Julie Speed
Posts: 1,430
|
Try the Auditor cd from http://new.remote-exploit.org/
I've been playing with it and it has many tools nicely organized with documentation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18
|
um... yea... so I just let airsnort run and ran cain and abel's MAC search a hundred times and when I got home today it had already cracked my key.
140 something interesting packets, 200k encrypted packets and a breadth of 2... it didnt decrypt the ascii pw correctly, but the HEX pw was perfect. the strange thing is, it used the packets coming from broadcast (FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF) instead of the mac of the AP to crack the key. either way, took less than 24 hours on a simple wireless network with only one computer associated. INFO ABOUT CARD: wlan0 IEEE 802.11-DS ESSID:"linksys" Nickname:"linksys" Mode:Auto Frequency:2.412GHz Access Point: 00:00:00:00:00:00 Bit Rate:2Mb/s Tx-Power:2346 dBm Retry min limit:8 RTS thr ff Fragment thr ffEncryption key ffLink Quality:0/92 Signal level:-69 dBm Noise level:-90 dBm Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0 Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0 DWL-650 REV P on slackware 2.4.26 w/ wlan-ng drivers Last edited by syst0lic : 02-10-2005 at 10:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Julie Speed
Posts: 1,430
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|