NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > Software > Unix/Linux
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2004   #136 (permalink)
chesh
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 10
One other thing I'd like to mention, when I do a weplab -a on my Kismet.dump file it says that there are XXXXX number of uniquie IVs which when I check Kismet seems to be the same number of data packets collected from my network. Does this seem right? The other number that Kismet shows is XXXX number of crypted packets collected, but that number doesn't seem to be referenced within weplab what-so-ever. So, are uniquie IV's crypted packets, or just uniquie data packets?

chesh
chesh is offline  
Old 10-13-2004   #137 (permalink)
chesh
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by chesh
My second question is, how does one generate more packets in order to crack? I've heard talk of doing an arping or something to that extent to generate packets. Would someone post the info on how this is done, if you need two wireless adapters, or what? Thanks guys.

chesh
Ok, I jumped the gun a little bit on a couple of these questions. I tried aircrack last night for the first time with airodump and aireplay. I got myself a 770mb dump file with 880k of unique IV packets. My new question is, when I load this into aircrack it says there is 880k worth of unique packets, but when I load it into weplab it says there is only 88k worth of packets. Why the difference? Also, airodump says that the network is a 54mb WPA encrypted network, when I know it's a BEFW11S4 using 128-bit WEP. I further this knowing that aircrack is supposed to deny WPA packets when loading the dump file and it loads all the packets just fine and starts away on it's little cracking adventure. I have to say, if I didn't know it was 128-bit WEP and started a 64-bit crack on it, it finished and told me that a key didn't exist in about 34secs. This was with aircrack fudge factor of 2. When I ran weplab on the other hand, it took an hour to two do discover that it wasn't a 64-bit key. Anyways, just thought I'd post my findings, any comments, flames are more then welcome.

chesh

Last edited by chesh : 10-14-2004 at 03:46 PM.
chesh is offline  
Old 10-15-2004   #138 (permalink)
chesh
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by joswr1ght
I'm not much for UI design (love those Unix tools though), but here goes. I'm going to release this tool in the first teaching of the SANS Wireless Auditing class in New Orleans in November (I am the author of this material), and will make it publicly available after that.

screen shot

This tool is an implementation of Robert Moskowitz's paper "Weakness in Passphrase Choice in WPA Interface" at http://wifinetnews.com/archives/002452.html. It kind of sucks, since it's pretty slow. I've done everything to optimize it that I believe can be done, but 4096 hmac-sha1 passes take quite a bit of time to derive the PMK from a dictionary word. I'm looking forward to comments after releasing publicly.

Thanks,

-Josh

I saw in the latest version of Auditor (auditor-081004-01) you've already released this tool to them. Since it's already in the public, when are you planning on releasing a source download to the masses?

chesh
chesh is offline  
Old 10-15-2004   #139 (permalink)
joswr1ght
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by chesh
I saw in the latest version of Auditor (auditor-081004-01) you've already released this tool to them. Since it's already in the public, when are you planning on releasing a source download to the masses?

chesh
11/3, right after the SANS WLAN Auditing course runs in New Orleans.

If anyone wants the source early and is willing to provide some feedback/testing, drop me a note at jwright@hasborg.com.

Thanks,

-Josh
__________________
-Joshua Wright
jwright@hasborg.com
http://home.jwu.edu/jwright/

Today I stumbled across the world's largest hotspot. The SSID is "linksys".


Check out the SANS advanced wireless auditing and assessment course:
Los Angeles
joswr1ght is offline  
Old 10-15-2004   #140 (permalink)
devine
Emergence
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 389
When I load this into aircrack it says there is 880k worth of unique packets, but when I load it into weplab it says there is only 88k worth of packets. Why the difference?

Hard to tell. Post the first meg of your pcap file somewhere, this would help me and TopoLB to track down the problem.

Also, airodump says that the network is a 54mb WPA encrypted network, when I know it's a BEFW11S4 using 128-bit WEP.

That's a known bug in airodump 2.1. Will be fixed in the next release.

it finished and told me that a key didn't exist in about 34secs. This was with aircrack fudge factor of 2.

Maybe try increasing the fudge factor. Also if it's 802.1X aircrack will very likely fail.

post-edit: messed up with the version number

Last edited by devine : 10-15-2004 at 12:44 PM.
devine is offline  
Old 10-15-2004   #141 (permalink)
chesh
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 10
What's the easiest way to cut down my 770mb pcap file to 1mb?

chesh
chesh is offline  
Old 10-15-2004   #142 (permalink)
joswr1ght
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by chesh
What's the easiest way to cut down my 770mb pcap file to 1mb?

chesh
Sample the first few thousand files with tcpdump:

$ tcpdump -r bigfile.dump -w smallfile.dump -c 2000

Repeat until the "-c" number gives you what you want.

Note: This will not work with tethereal, the "-c" behavior does not work when reading from a stored capture file.

-Josh
__________________
-Joshua Wright
jwright@hasborg.com
http://home.jwu.edu/jwright/

Today I stumbled across the world's largest hotspot. The SSID is "linksys".


Check out the SANS advanced wireless auditing and assessment course:
Los Angeles
joswr1ght is offline  
Old 10-16-2004   #143 (permalink)
Kronk
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13
Speeding Up WPA PSK Attack

Joshua,

The KisMAC tool implements the WPA PSK attack using G4 Altivec acceleration to improve performance significantly. Maybe you can do something similar with MMX with your WPA code.

The KisMAC source code is located at http://binaervarianz.de/projekte/pro...c/download.php and may be helpful.

Kronk
Kronk is offline  
Old 10-16-2004   #144 (permalink)
devine
Emergence
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kronk
The KisMAC tool implements the WPA PSK attack using G4 Altivec acceleration to improve performance significantly. Maybe you can do something similar with MMX with your WPA code.
Indeed. Also, I was thinking about distributed WPA-PSK cracking. Could speed up things quite a bit, especially if you have a few spare machines
devine is offline  
Old 01-04-2005   #145 (permalink)
grcore
Member at large
 
grcore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by chesh
What's the easiest way to cut down my 770mb pcap file to 1mb?

chesh
Are you trying to filter out the IV packets?

Use ethereal to and run a filter and save the output.

g
grcore is offline  
Old 02-20-2005   #146 (permalink)
net-titi
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1
Working with wrt54g ?

Would it work with Linksys WRT54G router, like Kismet does ?
net-titi is offline  
Old 02-23-2005   #147 (permalink)
devine
Emergence
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by chesh
What's the easiest way to cut down my 770mb pcap file to 1mb?
Not many options right now, but that's a planned feature of airodump 2.2, which will make it possible to only save the IVs from a live capture session, or extract then save them from a pcap file. Each IV will use about 6 bytes: bssid_index(1) + IV_itself(3) + ciphertext_start(2). However, this new file format will only be understood by aircrack 2.2.
devine is offline  
Old 04-21-2005   #148 (permalink)
kleptophobiac
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 310
Wow, this is a massively long thread, and I will admit that I ceased reading about page 11.

1) Would you care to post the win32 source code somewhere? I'm interested in taking a peek at it, even though I'm terrible with C (I do java... need to work on C)

2) I popped wzcook into a hex editor and did the proper edits, and it works great. I figured I'd post the fixed binary, just so others wouldn't have to go download a hex editor. here

3) Thanks for the work!
kleptophobiac is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.