![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Kirchhoff==Woot
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 86
|
non-ieeee compliant channeled AP's
Recently came across an AP that was using channels _not_ on the IEEE list of channels of 802.11A. Has anyone started to look at the HAL to see about adding channels? I guess the requirement would drive the solution...need ability to collect packets and pass them to kismet from APs operating on non standard channels.
thanks! -+= Syn Ack +=- |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72
|
HAL?
You do know that different countries get different channel no's and allocations. For the 5.8Ghz region people in the US are suposed to get 8 non-overlapping channels for LAN use and an extra 4 non-overlapping channels for WAN point to point links. How many channels are you being given and on which frequency are the non-IEEE channels based. What is the Vendor? Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72
|
This might be of interest and explain your excess channels in the 5.8Ghz spectrum.
Quote:
If you AP is new and says it is .11h compliant you probably have 24 channels. cool huh . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Kirchhoff==Woot
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 86
|
When I looked at the channels, they were not part of the new channels, most of the channels were within 1 or 2 of the approved channels. (ie. the ap used 53 and the ieee 802.11a channel was 54) I also checked the EMEA and Japan channels, it was not using them too.
I know that the WIDS vendor that was there, tuned their junk to the off channels too, but they were not talking... (typical) Most cards are softwar controlled, but it is (I think) controlled by the HAL and kernel vice drivers...If anyone has better gouge...give it up! Would like to use the Madwifi for this requirment,and stay away from others...rumor has it the the old..._old_ ar5k may be the answer. Thanks to all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72
|
I think .11h uses a mechanism called DFS to dynamically agree upon a channel to use. I have no idea how this works or what happens to other clients that are communicating on the channel. Do they all get moved?
syn-ack: perhaps you have a pre .11h AP? Similar all of the pre-n MIMO devices around at the moment that are based very loosely on what the standard might be. Perhaps the manufacturers of your AP heard about the .11h standard and made guesses about what the new supported channels might be? Keep in mind that is a big stab in the dark. Anyone know if .11h is a software upgrade like WEP -> WPA or a hardware upgrade like RC4 -> AES? Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Psychic Amish Stumbler
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 11,839
|
Quote:
Can you cite examples and sources for your information?
__________________
"One of these days, I'm going to cut you to pieces." If you're offended by this post, please feel free to report it to one of the many helpful moderators of this forum. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72
|
802.11j which was designed for use in Japan uses lower frequencies. However the Japanese wanted their cards to be useable in the rest of the world as well hence I believe the Jap cards are capabe of a range of frequencies. However, the entire range cannot be used at the same time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
I amuse you?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,127
|
Quote:
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/1...tgj_update.htm Of course "almost" as stated in this post may have taken into account that 802.11a tops out at 5.850GHz. Last edited by wrzwaldo : 10-09-2005 at 06:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72
|
well no, 802.11j is the 4.9 - 5 Ghz region. Additionally .11h compliant gear now allows the use of 24 channels in Europe. However, your correct, I think even with .11h, spectrum usage is still in the 5.8 Ghz band.
Do you think he could be talking of a card that encompasses both of these requirements? I understand your point, i didnt assume he was talking about one contiguous band from 4.9 - 6 Ghz. Interesting document you posted, I didnt realise that different countries used completely different frequencies. I always assumed they just allowed different numbers of channels Last edited by Roy_M : 10-09-2005 at 07:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
I amuse you?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,127
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|