![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Stumbling for Slack
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8
|
Security on the client side while using hotspots
In surfing the various wireless-related forums on the web, when discussing the topic of wireless security, most conversations seem to focus on AP security (and rightly so, I suppose). What I am curious about is security on the client side of things.
There are a lot of places in my area that offer free wireless access to their customers (many coffeeshops, several bars, and even a few laundamats). Most of these places allow this access via a wide open (no WEP) AP. My concern is that without at least WEP in the mix, what is there to stop some "31337 haX0r" from sitting in the corner sipping a cappuchino with a laptop running an 802.11b sniffer and having him grab, say, my POP3 password or my netstumbler.org forums password when i login? The soulution I have come up with for now is to set up my Win2K box at home to recieve VPN connections, and then after establishing the 802.11b connection while at a free hotspot, I then create a secure tunnel through the VPN at my house. I then surf through that, but as you can imagine, there is quite a performance hit compared to simply connecting to the insecure AP and surfing. So the questions I am posing to the community here are: 1) Is what I described above the best method of securing myself on the client side of things? When I say "best", I mean not only security-wise, but performance-wise (i understand that being more secure when using public APs will require some amount of performace loss (like VPNing) or inconvenience (changing firewall settings, etc...) 2) If not, what do you suggest? (I would love to know about some kind of software package that is designed to address wireless security on the client side of things, but maybe there is something else I am missing? 3) Am I being too "tinfoil" hattish (ie: am I making a mountain out of a mole hill in regards to worrying about someone sniffing traffic at free APs or am I misunderstnading the security risks)? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Drunken Stumbler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Anywhere but Utah
Posts: 1,794
|
Your being tinfoil hat enough. You never know what sort of crap people are doing. One of my guilty pleasures is to run driftnet and dsniff in the background (/dev/null'd of course) and just see what goes by.
Regular web surfing is'nt a big issue if it's for sports scores and news, unless you start going to sites requiring authentication. I'd tunnel everything I could that needed authentication (email, secure sites, etc) through the tunnel home. The performance hit is well worth the safety. Though you might want to consider some level of security that it's actually *your* box your connecting to and not a man-in-the-middle (airsnarf) There's not really much you can do in terms of 3rd party security other than a VPN since a public hotspot by definition needs to be open. My road connecting setup is: Firewalled laptop, ssh tunnel to home system with S/KEY one time passwords, do everything on remote workstation using VNC tunneled over SSH. The only traffic is in the SSH tunnel ![]()
__________________
Never drink anything larger than your head! Scaramental Wine Taster for the Church Of WiFi Buy our book: RFID Security "I reject your reality, and substitute my own!" – Adam Savage CoWF WPA Hash Tables |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
The PaPster
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Japan
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
Have you ever seen the movie "the core"??? Its been done many of times. and unless you have some way to encrypt ur info leaving your and decrypted on the server/website, anyone running a sniffer program will capture it all. So security or performance? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Mentally Fucked up!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Deep in the Woods.
Posts: 1,887
|
try http://anonymizer.com/index.cgi
That's what I use to tunnel http traffic when traveling, it's cheap and just works.
__________________
audit Blackberry Outage Mail List. Be the one of first people to know about RIM outages. Blackberry Chat Mail List. My day to day life. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Macaca
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 1,056
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |||
|
Stumbling for Slack
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Stumbling for Slack
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8
|
A few more resources
For any of you out there following this thread who are interested in a bit more security when using public wifi i found 2 sites that offer free HTTPS proxies that are useful for encrypting your surfing when using a network whos security you cannot verify:
The Cloak is a cool site that offers both free and paid services. The HTTPS service uses 256 bit encryption. The service is transparent (links on surfed pages are recoded to direct you thru the proxy) and there are no ads (which is nice) but free users are subject to a limited about of data transfer during a given time period (this varies based on traffic at the time). I had no problem checking mail and surfing slashdot and a few news sites before I used up my freebie time for the 5 hour period. It was also VERY fast (i noticed almost no difference between using the proxy and not) Proxify is a cool one as well. Free usage is not as limited as The Cloak, but you will be forced to view some ads at the top of every proxied page. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
http://www.zensur.freerk.com/#4.5.3 I'm a total n00b, so don't flame me if I'm being an idiot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
Advice is; Always update your antiviruses, always update your OS patches. enable your soft firewall, and ONLY give senstive data over CERTIFIED and secure SSL pages. As with Filesharing, I would not advise that in a coffeshop, unless its not sensitive data Am I missing something, Because I hear all the hype, yet I have not yet seen a case where passwords have been decrypted over the air while traveling to an SSL destination. But believe me the day SSL is cracked, we either have to move like lightning to 256k encryption, or Game over for Internet as we see it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1
|
use 802.1x
and do an authentication against the server provided by Radiuz. It's free.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brain M http://www.wirelessorbit.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,323
|
Quote:
When I find their info will post. currently the only 256bit encrytion device I know of is dlink. they offer a 256 bit on their wifi routers. I am sure there are more.
__________________
Against the run of the mill, static as it seems We break the surface tension with our wild kinetic dreams Curves and lines -- of grand designs... Tonight's movie "Soylent Green" has been brought to you by our sponsor - Waste Management My mind is like a Steel trap - Rusty and Illegal in most states |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Psychic Amish Stumbler
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 11,650
|
Quote:
__________________
"One of these days, I'm going to cut you to pieces." If you're offended by this post, please feel free to report it to one of the many helpful moderators of this forum. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5
|
passwords and cookies?
Quote:
Thanks.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Humourless EuroMod.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Mermaids, Denmark
Posts: 6,813
|
Quote:
Before posting again, please read all the posts in the Welcome Desk section. That might keep you out of trouble here... Dutch
__________________
All your answers are belong to Google. SEARCH DAMMIT! Warning. Warning. Low C8H10N4O2 level detected. Operator halted.... |
|
|
|
|