NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > Newbie Lounge
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-18-2005   #1 (permalink)
chowyee
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1
Debate: Which side is more true?

Hi. I'm a student in a College, where Wireless Access Points (802.11b) are installed around our college to provide wireless network connection for our computers.

The Access Point (outdoor version, sorry I cannot find the make and model, but it claims that it is possible of transmitting and receiving a wide range) that we're connecting to frequently hangs (access point seen, but nobody can connect, nobody can use). The current solution that the vendor does is to shut down, restart the Access Point, temporarily fixing the problem, which will recur in a while (sometimes a few hours, sometimes a few days).

We're looking at a more permanent solution here. The vendor insists that it is the presence of Ad-hoc networks (for WLAN gaming like Warcraft) that is bringing the Wireless Access Point down.

I however suggested that that is not the problem. My reasons are:
1. The access point's transmitting and receiving power should logically be stronger than the individual wireless card's power. So if there really is interference, why is it that the Wireless Access Point that "loses the battle", but not the Wireless Cards setting up the Ad-hoc network? Using Physics law, if the amplitude of the Access Point's wave is +3a, and the Wireless Card's wave is +a, even if destructive interference occurs, the lowest amplitude is still +2a right? Is that not enough for transmission of data? (Please correct me if I put the relative strengths incorrectly)

2. Using Intel ProSET/Wireless to check, the Access Point is set to Channel 6, while the Wireless Cards setting up the Ad-hoc network are set to Channel 1. The 802.11b specification states that Channel 6 and Channel 1 does not overlap. Hence, should interference be a problem here?

3. If interference occurs, it should be some computers that are affected only, but in our case, the whole body of students using that access point is affected.

4. Emperical evidence of situations where many Ad-hoc networks are present while the Wireless Access Point is working well (I'm surfing the net well while my friends are playing Warcraft for example), and many examples when the Wireless Access Point is down while nobody is using any Ad-hoc networks.

From my points, do you think my case that "Ad-hoc networks are not the cause of our college Access Point's malfunctioning" are justified? Actually I'm trying my best to prove to the vendor that it is that Access Point unit that is faulty, and the Vendor should replace it, instead of bringing up reasons like Peer to Peer Network.

Any suggestions would much be appreciated! Feel free to discuss any points that I've mentioned, if you think they're weak, they're strong etc.
chowyee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2005   #2 (permalink)
streaker69
Psychic Amish Stumbler
 
streaker69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 11,839
I would think one of the biggest problems is you have your AP set to Channel 6, the most commonly used channel around. Every single AP that comes out of the box is set to channel 6, approximately 54.05% of the people with AP's have them set to channel 6.

I would think it would also be up to the Vendor to prove his theory using emperical data, and specifications of his device. If he can't provide that then he's just blowing smoke outta his ass.
__________________
"One of these days, I'm going to cut you to pieces."

If you're offended by this post, please feel free to report it to one of the many helpful moderators of this forum.

Thank you.
streaker69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2005   #3 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
2. Using Intel ProSET/Wireless to check, the Access Point is set to Channel 6, while the Wireless Cards setting up the Ad-hoc network are set to Channel 1. The 802.11b specification states that Channel 6 and Channel 1 does not overlap. Hence, should interference be a problem here?
No, if the equipment is functioning properly then there should be no interference. I would consider getting a 3rd party to come out and do an RF study.
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2005   #4 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,098
Some APs (especially consumer grade APs pressed into 'enterprise' service) also crap out after X number of associations/clients.

Ad Hoc networks with a different SSID and on a clear channel seperation should have absolutely no effect on an AP. The AP shouldn't see them at all due to the different SSID, and the channel seperation of 1-6-11 should prevent any co-channel RF interference.

IF, and it's a big if, the Ad Hoc was within 5 meters of the AP, you might be flooding the AP with enought RF energy to cause a problem. But that's about the only way an Ad Hoc could cause the issues you're reporting.
__________________
Thorn
"I'm The Doctor. I'm a Time Lord. I am from the planet Gallifrey in the constellation Kasterborous. I'm 903 years old and I am the man who is going to save your lives and all 6 billion people on the planet below... You got a problem with that?"

Last edited by Thorn : 05-18-2005 at 08:55 AM.
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.