NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > Newbie Lounge
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-28-2004   #1 (permalink)
NetFox
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6
Orinoco gold PC card power unit

I used two Orinoco gold 802.11b cards (one transmits, one receives) to meassure the received power strength at a fixed distance, i.e, 2.5m. The indicated power strengh and noise at 2.5 m are 106 and 55. What are the units of these two values?
NetFox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004   #2 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,039
dBm, just like is says on the RSSI graph. By the way, those two numbers are reversed or you got them out of the text listing. dB values are usually negative numbers.

If you looked at the text output, then subtract 149. in which case the Signal would be -43dBm and the Noise would be -94dBm.

"dBm" stands for "deciBels microvolts". For more information on dB and how to understand them, look at the Antenna FAQ.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg dBm.jpg (7.8 KB, 106 views)
__________________
Thorn
"Lawyers should never marry lawyers. This is called inbreeding. It produces idiot children and more lawyers."
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004   #3 (permalink)
NetFox
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6
Thanks, Thorn.

I have another question. From the data I got at distances from 2.5m to 50m, the average received data match the the log-distance path loss model perfectly with a path loss exponent of 1.44. However, the data was meassured outdoor, so I guess this path loss exponent might be too small.

Is it possible that the indications given by the card are just signal amplitude but power? So when calculating the power, I need to square the amplitude, in this way, the path loss exponent will become 2.88, which might make more sense.

Last edited by NetFox : 06-28-2004 at 07:12 PM.
NetFox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004   #4 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by NetFox
Thanks, Thorn.

I have another question. From the data I got at distances from 2.5m to 50m, the average received data match the the log-distance path loss model perfectly with a path loss exponent of 1.44. However, the data was meassured outdoor, so I guess this path loss exponent might be too small.

Is it possible that the indications given by the card are just signal strengh but power? So when calculating the power, I need to square the strength, in this way, the path loss exponent will become 2.88, which might make more sense.
I'm not exactly clear on what you are asking. The signal strength is the received power.

Many a newbe has been annoyed here by me because I've asked them if they've done the math/ It gives you a good idea if something is possible or not. (You can't argue with physics.) However, don't get so hung up on the math that you miss the point of whether something will work or not.

One thing to keep in mind about the log-distance path loss model (or any math model with radios) is that the model is usually derived from ideal lab conditions using tuned test gear to remove all possible variables. The exact power level is known. The exact receive sensitivity is known. The exact loss of the cable and connectors are all known. No interfering RF sources are nearby. Etc, etc.

Out in the real world we have to deal with some (a lot of) unknowns. The antennae aren't perfect. The transmit level may be off slightly, as may the RX sensitivity. The lobes of the antennea on these cards have funny shapes. All of these things mean that doing the math just puts you in a ballpark and is probably never going to work out exactly the same as on paper.

That's why we have fudge factors of 10dBm on signal paths rather than 1 or 2dBm.
__________________
Thorn
"Lawyers should never marry lawyers. This is called inbreeding. It produces idiot children and more lawyers."
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004   #5 (permalink)
NetFox
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6
Sorry, when i said strength, i meant amplitude.
NetFox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004   #6 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,039
I don't believe the amplitude would have any effect, at least nothing to do with the RSSI.
__________________
Thorn
"Lawyers should never marry lawyers. This is called inbreeding. It produces idiot children and more lawyers."
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2004   #7 (permalink)
NetFox
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6
One problem about Orinoco classical gold

What is the RSSI range and how to convert it to dBm or mW?

Thanks!
NetFox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2004   #8 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,039
Threads merged

It is in dBm; as stated in my first reply.
__________________
Thorn
"Lawyers should never marry lawyers. This is called inbreeding. It produces idiot children and more lawyers."
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004   #9 (permalink)
NetFox
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6
strength vs. level

Is received signal level the same thing as received signal strength? If not, what is the difference. Thanks.
NetFox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004   #10 (permalink)
The Others
PeaceDriver
 
The Others's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dos Palabras, Mandoras
Posts: 2,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by NetFox
Is received signal level the same thing as received signal strength? If not, what is the difference. Thanks.
This type of thing seems to be occupying your mind a lot lately. Maybe a helpful book is in order?
__________________
all good ends all

?u=273
The Others is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004   #11 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by NetFox
Is received signal level the same thing as received signal strength? If not, what is the difference. Thanks.
Yes.

Please stick with one thread for the same issues.
__________________
Thorn
"Lawyers should never marry lawyers. This is called inbreeding. It produces idiot children and more lawyers."
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004   #12 (permalink)
NetFox
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6
appreciate !!!
NetFox is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.