![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6
|
Orinoco gold PC card power unit
I used two Orinoco gold 802.11b cards (one transmits, one receives) to meassure the received power strength at a fixed distance, i.e, 2.5m. The indicated power strengh and noise at 2.5 m are 106 and 55. What are the units of these two values?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Did you do the math?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,039
|
dBm, just like is says on the RSSI graph. By the way, those two numbers are reversed or you got them out of the text listing. dB values are usually negative numbers.
If you looked at the text output, then subtract 149. in which case the Signal would be -43dBm and the Noise would be -94dBm. "dBm" stands for "deciBels microvolts". For more information on dB and how to understand them, look at the Antenna FAQ.
__________________
Thorn "Lawyers should never marry lawyers. This is called inbreeding. It produces idiot children and more lawyers." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6
|
Thanks, Thorn.
I have another question. From the data I got at distances from 2.5m to 50m, the average received data match the the log-distance path loss model perfectly with a path loss exponent of 1.44. However, the data was meassured outdoor, so I guess this path loss exponent might be too small. Is it possible that the indications given by the card are just signal amplitude but power? So when calculating the power, I need to square the amplitude, in this way, the path loss exponent will become 2.88, which might make more sense. Last edited by NetFox : 06-28-2004 at 07:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Did you do the math?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,039
|
Quote:
Many a newbe has been annoyed here by me because I've asked them if they've done the math/ It gives you a good idea if something is possible or not. (You can't argue with physics.) However, don't get so hung up on the math that you miss the point of whether something will work or not. One thing to keep in mind about the log-distance path loss model (or any math model with radios) is that the model is usually derived from ideal lab conditions using tuned test gear to remove all possible variables. The exact power level is known. The exact receive sensitivity is known. The exact loss of the cable and connectors are all known. No interfering RF sources are nearby. Etc, etc. Out in the real world we have to deal with some (a lot of) unknowns. The antennae aren't perfect. The transmit level may be off slightly, as may the RX sensitivity. The lobes of the antennea on these cards have funny shapes. All of these things mean that doing the math just puts you in a ballpark and is probably never going to work out exactly the same as on paper. That's why we have fudge factors of 10dBm on signal paths rather than 1 or 2dBm.
__________________
Thorn "Lawyers should never marry lawyers. This is called inbreeding. It produces idiot children and more lawyers." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Did you do the math?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,039
|
I don't believe the amplitude would have any effect, at least nothing to do with the RSSI.
__________________
Thorn "Lawyers should never marry lawyers. This is called inbreeding. It produces idiot children and more lawyers." |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Did you do the math?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,039
|
Threads merged
It is in dBm; as stated in my first reply.
__________________
Thorn "Lawyers should never marry lawyers. This is called inbreeding. It produces idiot children and more lawyers." |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
PeaceDriver
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dos Palabras, Mandoras
Posts: 2,920
|
Quote:
__________________
all good ends all ?u=273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Did you do the math?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,039
|
Quote:
Please stick with one thread for the same issues.
__________________
Thorn "Lawyers should never marry lawyers. This is called inbreeding. It produces idiot children and more lawyers." |
|
|
|
|