NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > Newbie Lounge
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-31-2004   #1 (permalink)
qubit
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4
WEP+XP doesn't work, yet WEP+Linux is fine

This problem has been bothering me.

I have a DLink DWL-5000AP (802.11a AP), and I have been unsuccessful in connecting to it using Windows under Open and Shared WEP (Proxim Silver PCCard, DLink DWL-A650 PCCard, DLink DWL-AG520 PCI). All the computers have the same installation, so I'm suspecting a Windows error. The installation is of Windows SP1 with August Autopatcher (no SP2).

Wondering if this were really a Windows problem, I started up linux on one of the computers, used the proxim card (atheros chipset and cvs madwifi drivers), and stuck in the commands: "iwconfig ath0 essid blah key s:zzzzz enc on", and if it were shared, "iwpriv ath0 authmode 2", and a "dhclient ath0" would get me right on track, while the windows machine AT THAT SAME MOMENT would not be able to get authenticated at all.

Disabling WEP and falling back to the MAC whitelist works fine. Entering the key in hex and ASCII makes no difference. I just get "Wireless Networks Detected, Click here to . . .", and it sends me in an infinite loop. Deleting the network from the preferred networks list and reconfiguring makes no difference.

I've also tinkered with the AP. I've upgraded the firmware to the latest version on dlink's site, used a default shared key, or individualized shared key, 64 bits and 128 bits, to no avail. Linux, however, kept up with every change made, and everything was working (including pinging and accessing the rest of the network through the AP).

Can anyone shed light on this problem? Thanks in advance.
qubit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2004   #2 (permalink)
streaker69
Psychic Amish Stumbler
 
streaker69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 11,798
It's gotta be something you're missing on your configuration there. I currently have 4 machines on my network here at the house, all WinXP sp2 with varying NIC's. One Dell Truemobile 1150, One WPC54G, a USR 11mb card (don't remember the model) and a Netgear PCI 54mb Card. They all connect just fine to my Linksys WAP54G and my WAP11. All running 128bit WEP.

I've set up hundreds of machines with varying operating systems and NIC's in the past year or so, and I've never seen the problem you're describing.
__________________
"One of these days, I'm going to cut you to pieces."

If you're offended by this post, please feel free to report it to one of the many helpful moderators of this forum.

Thank you.
streaker69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2005   #3 (permalink)
qubit
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4
Configurations settings aside (though I have mysteriously experienced Windows insisting that my network is Open and not Shared when I tell it to, and resets itself back to Open in the next "Wireless Network Found!" cycle), have there been any instances were the patches and updates installed on Windows affect whether or not you can connect to a WEP network? There are several articles on Microsoft's Knowledge Base, but none of them deal with my computers. I also suspect the fact that all of them are almost nearly identical in terms of patches.
qubit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2005   #4 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,084
Quote:
Originally Posted by qubit
...(though I have mysteriously experienced Windows insisting that my network is Open and not Shared when I tell it to, and resets itself back to Open in the next "Wireless Network Found!" cycle)...
"Open" and "Shared" are Authentication methods and have nothing to do with the encrypted status of the network.

When you switch it to "Shared" on Windows , you're telling it to use a different way to authenticate. If you also don't set it to Shared on the AP, then it fails authenticate on the next detection cycle, and resets to Open, authenticates using Open and works. Windows is just telling you that.

By the way "Open" is more secure than "Shared", due to the way it functions. Leave it set to Open Authentication with WEP/WPA encryption to make the network as secure as possible using the built in mechanisms. (It's not too secure, but it's a start.)
__________________
Thorn
"I'm The Doctor. I'm a Time Lord. I am from the planet Gallifrey in the constellation Kasterborous. I'm 903 years old and I am the man who is going to save your lives and all 6 billion people on the planet below... You got a problem with that?"
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2005   #5 (permalink)
qubit
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4
Ah okay thanks. I'll set it to open then.

Does it matter that Windows reverted back to open even though the AP had shared authentication set?

On a side note, where can I find something that describes the technical differences between open and shared, and why shared is less secure?
qubit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2005   #6 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by qubit
Ah okay thanks. I'll set it to open then.

Does it matter that Windows reverted back to open even though the AP had shared authentication set?

On a side note, where can I find something that describes the technical differences between open and shared, and why shared is less secure?

Google...
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2005   #7 (permalink)
qubit
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrzwaldo
Google...
Ironically, google pointed me back to netstumbler forums. =)

WEP Authentication

As an update, the linux laptop I had used to diagnose my connection now has successfully connected onto windows. I repeated what I did on the other computers, and still no sign of success. The only thing I changed was the SSID on the AP (leaving it on broadcast so my dumb Windows clients won't dump that AP for another broadcasting its SSID). As far as I can see, the length of the SSID may have an affect, going from a 11-letter long SSID to a 4-letter long SSID. May this have an effect?
qubit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2005   #8 (permalink)
ShadowFX
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Red face

Quote:
Originally Posted by qubit
Ironically, google pointed me back to netstumbler forums. =)

WEP Authentication

As an update, the linux laptop I had used to diagnose my connection now ...<SniP>... May this have an effect?
subscribe to:
microsoft.public.windows.networking.wireless

There is a discussion on this problem.
ShadowFX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.