NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > WiFi Forums > Hardware
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-25-2004   #1 (permalink)
chemman14
CadillacStumbler
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 250
2.4ghz phone with wireless internet??

my mom just got a 2.4 ghz phone for xmas and i was told that this will make my wireless internet setup obsolete because of conflicting frequencies. is this tru???
chemman14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #2 (permalink)
Barry
Managing the iTards.
 
Barry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,883
It can mess with the network, but I wouldn't worry about it too much. It's more one of those try it and see things.
__________________
Never do anything you don't want to explain to the paramedics.
Barry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #3 (permalink)
chemman14
CadillacStumbler
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry
It can mess with the network, but I wouldn't worry about it too much. It's more one of those try it and see things.
hmm alright
hopefully you can take it back
chemman14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #4 (permalink)
beakmyn
Free Public Wifi
 
beakmyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by chemman14
my mom just got a 2.4 ghz phone for xmas and i was told that this will make my wireless internet setup obsolete because of conflicting frequencies. is this tru???
It is possible that the phone will cause interference with your card, but unlikely. A quick way to check is to use a card that is compatible with NetStumbler and run it and then use the phone. If the signal to noise ratio goes up then the phone is interfering with your connection.

So, what do you do? Well first you switch the channel on your WAP and see if the problem goes away.

I use my laptop as my main computer at home and I'm sitting right next to my Uniden 2.4Ghz phone and have never had a problem with interference. For sake of arguement my WAP is <15 feet away also.

Granted your mileage may vary but it's definately not the end of the world.
__________________
┌──────────────────────────────┐
NS Icons Explained|et hoc genus omne
└──────────────────────────────┘


Creating yesterday's future, Today!
beakmyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #5 (permalink)
OldSchool
Registered Member
 
OldSchool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by chemman14
my mom just got a 2.4 ghz phone for xmas and i was told that this will make my wireless internet setup obsolete because of conflicting frequencies. is this tru???

I have a Panasonic 2.4ghz expandable system and have no problems. Most phones operating in the 2.4 range search for un-used bands that are fairly narrow and I have no problems at all.
OldSchool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #6 (permalink)
streaker69
Psychic Amish Stumbler
 
streaker69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 12,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSchool
I have a Panasonic 2.4ghz expandable system and have no problems. Most phones operating in the 2.4 range search for un-used bands that are fairly narrow and I have no problems at all.
While your Panasonic phone may do this, alot of the cheaper phones do not. I have had many (over 20) clients report issues with 2.4ghz phones and their wireless network. The biggest issue occurs when the base station of the phone is between the client machine and the AP. If that kind of circumstance can be avoided, you just might be able to use that phone. Otherwise exchange it for the new 5.8ghz phones.
__________________
Treat your gun like your genitals, only whip it out when it's absolutely necessary.
streaker69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #7 (permalink)
RedSector
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 673
Quote:
Originally Posted by streaker69
Otherwise exchange it for the new 5.8ghz phones.
Or be cool like me and me and use older 900mhz phones
__________________
Get thine ass into the Church
The Church of Wifi
RedSector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #8 (permalink)
streaker69
Psychic Amish Stumbler
 
streaker69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 12,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedSector
Or be cool like me and me and use older 900mhz phones
Or really cool like the most of the Mods here and use them 43mhz phones..
__________________
Treat your gun like your genitals, only whip it out when it's absolutely necessary.
streaker69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #9 (permalink)
RedSector
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 673
Those phones give me the creeps. I picked one up on my scanner once (didn't listen, thats rude/probably illegal). I have been paranoid about them since then.
__________________
Get thine ass into the Church
The Church of Wifi
RedSector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #10 (permalink)
Airstreamer
Sniffin' the aether
 
Airstreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: A little North of Reason
Posts: 2,822
2.4

Quote:
Originally Posted by streaker69
While your Panasonic phone may do this, alot of the cheaper phones do not. I have had many (over 20) clients report issues with 2.4ghz phones and their wireless network. The biggest issue occurs when the base station of the phone is between the client machine and the AP. If that kind of circumstance can be avoided, you just might be able to use that phone. Otherwise exchange it for the new 5.8ghz phones.
Add me to that list. Our 2.4 phone wipes out the wireless. I can tell when anybody in the house goes off hook, 'cause my connection bites it. Sometimes it will reconnect, but mostly not. I could probably move the AP and the phone bases around and minimize it, but it just hasn't been that important.

The old spread spectrum 900mHz phone we had was amazing. I put the base up in the bedroom window and drove to the Wal-Mart parking lot about 1 mile away. I could get dial tone just about anywhere in the lot. It was line of sight with nothing in the way though.


sTEVE
__________________
"America is at that awkward stage.
It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards.."

- Claire Wolfe, 101 Things to Do 'Til the Revolution
Airstreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #11 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Airstreamer
Add me to that list. Our 2.4 phone wipes out the wireless. I can tell when anybody in the house goes off hook, 'cause my connection bites it. Sometimes it will reconnect, but mostly not. I could probably move the AP and the phone bases around and minimize it, but it just hasn't been that important.

The old spread spectrum 900mHz phone we had was amazing. I put the base up in the bedroom window and drove to the Wal-Mart parking lot about 1 mile away. I could get dial tone just about anywhere in the lot. It was line of sight with nothing in the way though.


sTEVE

Thats reminds me of the time that my 900Mhz got packed in my suitcase on a trip back east. I was able to get a dialtone from my room (there was a rather large housing developement next to this hotel). Just curious if you actually verified it was your base you were connected to?
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #12 (permalink)
Airstreamer
Sniffin' the aether
 
Airstreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: A little North of Reason
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrzwaldo
Thats reminds me of the time that my 900Mhz got packed in my suitcase on a trip back east. I was able to get a dialtone from my room (there was a rather large housing developement next to this hotel). Just curious if you actually verified it was your base you were connected to?

Hmm.. Good question. However, while I was wandering aimlessly in the lot, the damn thing rang, and it was a call for my mother-in-law who lives with us!

It was supposed to be not only spread spectrum, but also was supposed to sync the encryption with the base when put in it for charging.

Guess it worked!

PS: Signed up for WiGLE, but uploads are busted at this moment. Bobzilla says they are working on it.

sTEVE
__________________
"America is at that awkward stage.
It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards.."

- Claire Wolfe, 101 Things to Do 'Til the Revolution
Airstreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #13 (permalink)
RedSector
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 673
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrzwaldo
Thats reminds me of the time that my 900Mhz got packed in my suitcase on a trip back east. I was able to get a dialtone from my room (there was a rather large housing developement next to this hotel). Just curious if you actually verified it was your base you were connected to?
Usually the phones only connect to thier own brand and model of base station. I don't think the phone will connect to another base station even if it is the same model though, because in a situation like an apartment there would be havoc. Though you never know.

Personally I prefer 900mhz for phones. They have pretty good audio quality and thier range is killer. If i were to get a new one id hunt down a 900mhz one.
__________________
Get thine ass into the Church
The Church of Wifi
RedSector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #14 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedSector
Usually the phones only connect to thier own brand and model of base station. I don't think the phone will connect to another base station even if it is the same model though, because in a situation like an apartment there would be havoc. Though you never know.

Personally I prefer 900mhz for phones. They have pretty good audio quality and thier range is killer. If i were to get a new one id hunt down a 900mhz one.

There was a time when this was in fact a problem. I recall a couple of instances where several long distance phone calls were made doing this. The charges ended up being reversed and the originator of the calls was charged with (if I remember correctly) theft of service.

Or it may have been diversion of services

Quote:
(b) Diversion of services.--A person is guilty of theft if, having control over the disposition of services of others to which he is not entitled, he knowingly diverts such services to his own benefit or to the benefit of another not entitled thereto.

Last edited by wrzwaldo : 12-25-2004 at 08:07 PM.
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #15 (permalink)
streaker69
Psychic Amish Stumbler
 
streaker69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 12,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedSector
Usually the phones only connect to thier own brand and model of base station. I don't think the phone will connect to another base station even if it is the same model though, because in a situation like an apartment there would be havoc. Though you never know.

Personally I prefer 900mhz for phones. They have pretty good audio quality and thier range is killer. If i were to get a new one id hunt down a 900mhz one.
All modern day cordless phones have a security code that passes back and forth between the base and the handset. Unless the codes match, the phone will not communicate with the base and vice versa.

The old AT&T phones used to lose their code constantly and would give a "BEEP DA DA". If you heard that it was a clear sign it lost it's code. You had to put the phone on the base and unplug the base to resend the code to the handset. Technology for that system has improved greatly over the years and now it's very seldom that a phone will lose it's code.

Many times when you put a phone back onto a base station now, you'll see the "activity" light flicker. That's normally a sign that it's resetting the code in the handset.
__________________
Treat your gun like your genitals, only whip it out when it's absolutely necessary.
streaker69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.