NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > WiFi Forums > Hardware
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-25-2004   #16 (permalink)
OldSchool
Registered Member
 
OldSchool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrzwaldo
There was a time when this was in fact a problem. I recall a couple of instances where several long distance phone calls were made doing this. The charges ended up being reversed and the originator of the calls was charged with (if I remember correctly) theft of service.

Or it may have been diversion of services
Geesh what does a decent 2.4 ghz phone with some kind of line security cost? I seen them at Wal-mart ( the pit of hell before x-mas) for $39.99. Get a decent one for mothers day , slip the ghetto 2.4 interfering one in the trash and sell the 900 Mhz "hack out my cordless phone base" to your neighbor ar your next garage sale.

Even if you buy it at Wal-mart and when you bring it home it messes with your 802.11 network bring it back. Heck put a couple of banannas in the box they will still give your money back J/K.
OldSchool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #17 (permalink)
streaker69
Psychic Amish Stumbler
 
streaker69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 12,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSchool
Even if you buy it at Wal-mart and when you bring it home it messes with your 802.11 network bring it back. Heck put a couple of banannas in the box they will still give your money back J/K.
OT but a funny story..

Friend of mine goes to CompUSA to get a CDWriter they had on sale. First one he gets, takes it home, opens it up and it's some old quad speed reader sitting in the box. He takes it back right away explains the situation. They give him some trouble but give him another one. He takes it out to the car, opens it and it has a 5 1/4 drive inside. Brings it right back in. Store Drone goes back and gets another one off the shelf, opens it up and it has another CD Reader inside. Apparently someone was buying these things and returning them with other equipment inside.
__________________
Treat your gun like your genitals, only whip it out when it's absolutely necessary.
streaker69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2004   #18 (permalink)
RedSector
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 673
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSchool
sell the 900 Mhz "hack out my cordless phone base" to your neighbor ar your next garage sale.
You might not want to loose your 900mhz phone yet, Mine is a Digital 900mhz Spread Spectrum, and I pretty sure it has encryption. You might want to see if yours does too. I'd never give up mine for a 2.4ghz one.
__________________
Get thine ass into the Church
The Church of Wifi
RedSector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2004   #19 (permalink)
fordem
Tropical Stumbler
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 575
For those of you who are outside of the US - you may also need to consider cell phone service interference.

I bought a 900MHz cordless to avoid interference with my 802.11 wireless, and a couple of months later the two cell providers here both rolled out 900MHz GSM - now everytime a cell phone rings the cordless goes crazy.
fordem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005   #20 (permalink)
theprez98
SpoonfeederExtraordinaire
 
theprez98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,755
Ok, I confess, I revived an old thread. But it wasn't that old. And besides, it's right on topic. Anyways...

Just an update on a problem I was having. I suspected interference when I kept losing a wireless connection in my house. I had a 2.4 ghz phone hooked up, but wasn't using it (plugged in to the wall, but never actually used the phone). The connection would get lost every hour or sometimes even less. Changing channels did not help to solve the problem. So I literally unplugged the 2.4 ghz phone from the wall. The computer has not lost the connection once in the four days since I unplugged the phone.

Of course it could have been some other source of outside interference that coincided with unplugging the 2.4 ghz phone, but as long as the computer stays connected, I'll lean on unplugging the phone as the solution to the problem. I have enough 900 mhz phones to pick up the slack.
theprez98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005   #21 (permalink)
streaker69
Psychic Amish Stumbler
 
streaker69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 12,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by theprez98
Ok, I confess, I revived an old thread. But it wasn't that old. And besides, it's right on topic. Anyways...

Just an update on a problem I was having. I suspected interference when I kept losing a wireless connection in my house. I had a 2.4 ghz phone hooked up, but wasn't using it (plugged in to the wall, but never actually used the phone). The connection would get lost every hour or sometimes even less. Changing channels did not help to solve the problem. So I literally unplugged the 2.4 ghz phone from the wall. The computer has not lost the connection once in the four days since I unplugged the phone.

Of course it could have been some other source of outside interference that coincided with unplugging the 2.4 ghz phone, but as long as the computer stays connected, I'll lean on unplugging the phone as the solution to the problem. I have enough 900 mhz phones to pick up the slack.
Was the handset actually on the base during this time period?
__________________
Treat your gun like your genitals, only whip it out when it's absolutely necessary.
streaker69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005   #22 (permalink)
theprez98
SpoonfeederExtraordinaire
 
theprez98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by streaker69
Was the handset actually on the base during this time period?
Yes. 100% of the time. That's what was so intriguing to me. I figured it wouldn't be transmitting, and thus shouldn't be causing any sort of interference. Beats me. When I first mentioned it to you a few days ago I didn't even mention the 2.4 ghz phone because of that exact reason, we weren't even using it, and it was on the base simply charging. Oh well, I can't argue with the results. And I have to be careful experimenting with it anymore, too, because the wife's internet is working now...

Last edited by theprez98 : 05-27-2005 at 07:51 AM.
theprez98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005   #23 (permalink)
beakmyn
Free Public Wifi
 
beakmyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,068
I believe it was still transmitting. The phone has a built in "security" system and every once in awhile it changes the key. This is to prevent two phones from being able to listen in on one another's conversation. My guess is every hour the phone was talking to the base through wireless and updating it's "key".
__________________
┌──────────────────────────────┐
NS Icons Explained|et hoc genus omne
└──────────────────────────────┘


Creating yesterday's future, Today!
beakmyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005   #24 (permalink)
theprez98
SpoonfeederExtraordinaire
 
theprez98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by beakmyn
I believe it was still transmitting. The phone has a built in "security" system and every once in awhile it changes the key. This is to prevent two phones from being able to listen in on one another's conversation. My guess is every hour the phone was talking to the base through wireless and updating it's "key".
I figured it was something like that. It just didn't occur to me when I first thought about potential sources of interference. Oh well, just dig up another 900 mhz phone...
theprez98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005   #25 (permalink)
Dutch
Humourless EuroMod.
 
Dutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Mermaids, Denmark
Posts: 6,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by theprez98
Yes. 100% of the time. That's what was so intriguing to me. I figured it wouldn't be transmitting, and thus shouldn't be causing any sort of interference. Beats me. When I first mentioned it to you a few days ago I didn't even mention the 2.4 ghz phone because of that exact reason, we weren't even using it, and it was on the base simply charging. Oh well, I can't argue with the results. And I have to be careful experimenting with it anymore, too, because the wife's internet is working now...
Finally... Emperical data proving that females have a special relationship with telephones.

From now on, we can refer to your example, and say to our spouses : "Stop using the phones, and your computer won't fuck up so much...".

I just wonder if it will work with teen daughters...




Dutch
__________________
All your answers are belong to Google. SEARCH DAMMIT!
Warning. Warning.
Low C8H10N4O2 level detected. Operator halted....
Dutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005   #26 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch
Finally... Emperical data proving that females have a special relationship with telephones. ...
You needed outside data to prove this? I always thought it was one of those things which is immediately obvious to the most casual observer.
__________________
Thorn
"Read Altas Shrugged. Compare it to today. Repeat as necessary"
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005   #27 (permalink)
skizziks
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 118
2.4ghz Phones and Wireless Lans

Wireless Lans will not transmit if there is another transmission on the same band....The Lan or the AP will wait until there is no traffic on that band before it sends its packets... Thus an ap will not transmit when there is a 2.4ghz phone transmitting on the same band....
skizziks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005   #28 (permalink)
Dutch
Humourless EuroMod.
 
Dutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Mermaids, Denmark
Posts: 6,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by skizziks
Wireless Lans will not transmit if there is another transmission on the same band....The Lan or the AP will wait until there is no traffic on that band before it sends its packets... Thus an ap will not transmit when there is a 2.4ghz phone transmitting on the same band....
<AlexTrebek>
B eeeeep.. Wrong answer, next contestant please...
</AlexTrebek>

What happens is that there is to much NOISE due to interference on the same frequency, so the AP and/or the client is unable to decode the data it receives, as it comes through mangled, and the data therefore needs to be retransmitted.

Proof: Use a 2.4 Ghz cordless phone, while running Kismet. You will see the beacons from the AP (i.e. the AP is transmitting) and if you have a card which reports noiselevels correctly, you will see the noisefloor rise, possibly even forcing the client and AP to resync at lower transmission rates, and even dissassociate.

Dutch
__________________
All your answers are belong to Google. SEARCH DAMMIT!
Warning. Warning.
Low C8H10N4O2 level detected. Operator halted....
Dutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005   #29 (permalink)
Dutch
Humourless EuroMod.
 
Dutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Mermaids, Denmark
Posts: 6,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorn
You needed outside data to prove this? I always thought it was one of those things which is immediately obvious to the most casual observer.
Think it over Thorn....What happens to you, if you say to your spouse that you have observed she and her fellow females use the phones to much ??

Now you can point her to an emperical dataset, AND pass any blame to theprez98 CMB in effect

Dutch
__________________
All your answers are belong to Google. SEARCH DAMMIT!
Warning. Warning.
Low C8H10N4O2 level detected. Operator halted....
Dutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005   #30 (permalink)
theprez98
SpoonfeederExtraordinaire
 
theprez98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch
Think it over Thorn....What happens to you, if you say to your spouse that you have observed she and her fellow females use the phones to much ??

Now you can point her to an emperical dataset, AND pass any blame to theprez98 CMB in effect

Dutch
Oh sure, blame it all on me!
theprez98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.