NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > WiFi Forums > Hardware
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-15-2004   #1 (permalink)
cmavr8
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 19
54mbps VS 108mbps

Hello readers.

I am about to buy a pci and a pcimcia cards. I will buy either 54 or 108mbps.


The distance between the cards will be large.

Logically the greater the "starter-named speed" is the larger the real speed and the velocity will be. so it is better to buy an 108 than a 54.


but a friend of mine (he works for intel) told me that the 108 model will need greater signal strength than the 54, so for this great distance it would be better to buy the 54 models than the 108s.


what is your opinion? please if you can do not refer to complex formulas and experts' language cause I know many of you are technicians and I am not...


so plz help..

thank you even for the time you spent to read so far..
cmavr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2004   #2 (permalink)
Madhadder
General "Noob Basher"
 
Madhadder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 1,620
Get an 802.11G card and be happy....

Even if you do get a 108mb card, you must be very close to the AP
and have a super strong signal. So most of the time you won't get a 108mb
connection.

Quote:
speed" is the larger the real speed and the velocity will be
As far as I know Velocity has nothing to do with the speed of your wireless
conn. as all radio waves move a the same speed.
__________________
Legends may sleep, but they never die!!!!
Madhadder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2004   #3 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmavr8
...
The distance between the cards will be large. ...
Define "large." If you're expecting this to work a 108mps over a 15 mile radius, forget it right now. If you think "large" is several thousand square feet, or perhaps an acre or two, it might be something possible to do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmavr8
... Logically the greater the "starter-named speed" is the larger the real speed and the velocity will be. so it is better to buy an 108 than a 54. ...
Not always. Besides, the 108mps rated equipment is usually proprietary. Not a smart move, unless you expect not never add any other brand of equipment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmavr8
...
but a friend of mine (he works for intel) told me that the 108 model will need greater signal strength than the 54, so for this great distance it would be better to buy the 54 models than the 108s. ...
This is generally true, but it depends on the distance, and other factors.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmavr8
... what is your opinion? please if you can do not refer to complex formulas and experts' language cause I know many of you are technicians and I am not...
Like it or not this stuff involves math, and it IS technical. We also don't tend to spoonfeed people. If you expect us to design the system, forget it. If you want pointers to help with your design, then that's what you'll get. It is also pretty hard to describe some of this stuff without the techical names. Again, we can give you pointers on were to look.

Besides, the math isn't that hard. If you graduated from the average high school you should be able to do it. It's simple stuff: some algerbra, some trigonometry, some geometry.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmavr8
so plz help..

thank you even for the time you spent to read so far..
You're welcome. (By the way, AOL talk ("plz") and a lack of capitalization will only convince people that you're not worth helping.)
__________________
Thorn
"Read Altas Shrugged. Compare it to today. Repeat as necessary"
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2004   #4 (permalink)
dgstinner
Wardriver in Jersey
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 99
According to this article on TechTV the 108Mbps speed most likely comes from channel bonding where multiple channels are combined to get a faster throughput. It's very similar how back in the days of dialup, you could use 2 modems to get a faster download by combining them together. The problem with channel bonding is that any neighbors that have wireless will be affected. They also go on to say that Linksys' Speedbooster technology won't interfere.
dgstinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004   #5 (permalink)
cmavr8
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorn
Define "large." If you're expecting this to work a 108mps over a 15 mile radius, forget it right now. If you think "large" is several thousand square feet, or perhaps an acre or two, it might be something possible to do.



Not always. Besides, the 108mps rated equipment is usually proprietary. Not a smart move, unless you expect not never add any other brand of equipment.



This is generally true, but it depends on the distance, and other factors.



Like it or not this stuff involves math, and it IS technical. We also don't tend to spoonfeed people. If you expect us to design the system, forget it. If you want pointers to help with your design, then that's what you'll get. It is also pretty hard to describe some of this stuff without the techical names. Again, we can give you pointers on were to look.

Besides, the math isn't that hard. If you graduated from the average high school you should be able to do it. It's simple stuff: some algerbra, some trigonometry, some geometry.



You're welcome. (By the way, AOL talk ("plz") and a lack of capitalization will only convince people that you're not worth helping.)




hi again, and thanks for the answers...


my pc was broken so I couldn't reply(I now write from another partition...)

1.by large I mean 300meters

2."Not always. Besides, the 108mps rated equipment is usually proprietary. Not a smart move, unless you expect not never add any other brand of equipment."

what do you mean by proprietary?

3.and I don't use aol, I just say plz to buy some time, that's all (although thanks for the advice...!)
cmavr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004   #6 (permalink)
G8tK33per
Asshole Emeritus
 
G8tK33per's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Goomba's Booty Boardwalk
Posts: 6,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmavr8
hi again, and thanks for the answers...


my pc was broken so I couldn't reply(I now write from another partition...)

1.by large I mean 300meters

2."Not always. Besides, the 108mps rated equipment is usually proprietary. Not a smart move, unless you expect not never add any other brand of equipment."

what do you mean by proprietary?

3.and I don't use aol, I just say plz to buy some time, that's all (although thanks for the advice...!)
The evidence of uselessness continues...TardTyping.
__________________
"My mind is aglow with whirling, transient nodes of thought careening through a cosmic vapor of invention."

Sons of Confederate Veterans
G8tK33per is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004   #7 (permalink)
Redman247
Decibel Disseminator
 
Redman247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mannhiem, Germany
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmavr8
what do you mean by proprietary?

He means that one manufacturers 54Mbps card will not work with a different manufacturers card to produce 108Mbps. You will need to buy your AP (Access Point) and card('s) from the same manufacture to achieve 108Mbs, otherwise you will have to drop down to 54Mbps regardless of the cards capability to go faster.

Short and sweet: If you want 108Mbps be prepared to buy only one name brand of networking equipment for that wireless network.
__________________
BastardCard Bastardize the possibilities....
Accepted in over 187 countries as a way to tell others to shut the hell up! BastardCard, not just another card, it's a way of life!
Redman247 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004   #8 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmavr8
1.by large I mean 300meters ...
That is size are is possible, alhough I wouldn't expect much beyond 1mps at the edges, depending on the WLAN design. To achive higher speeds, you will need to have multiple APs dispersed throughout the area.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmavr8
2."Not always. Besides, the 108mps rated equipment is usually proprietary. Not a smart move, unless you expect not never add any other brand of equipment."

what do you mean by proprietary? ...
Exactly what Redman247 said. (Thanks, Redman247!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmavr8
3.and I don't use aol, I just say plz to buy some time, that's all (although thanks for the advice...!)
It doesn't matter whether or not you use AOL or not, it's the moronic abuse of the English language that is exemplified by AOL users. Specifically, things such as not properly capitalizing and shortening words like "please" to "plz."
__________________
Thorn
"Read Altas Shrugged. Compare it to today. Repeat as necessary"
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2004   #9 (permalink)
sparafina
Registered Member
 
sparafina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: TX,MD,NY
Posts: 1,430
You should also consider how you use the network.

Are you going to use it for internet primarily or are you moving large files between devices? It you use it for surfing, email, and moderately sized downloads then 54mbps is probably much faster than your internet connection. If you are moving large files between devices or do gigabit downloads on an hourly basis then you probably want to get the fastest transfer rates possible. Of course twisted pair is faster and cheaper for that sort network usage.
sparafina is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.