NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > WiFi Forums > Hardware
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2002   #1 (permalink)
 
Posts: n/a
The Death of Wi-Fi?

>>>>
Internetnews.com reports on a potential FCC ruling limiting 2.4 GHz radiated signal: this is the most frightening development to hit Wi-Fi in its history. If the attempt by satellite radio firm Sirius succeeds, public space, wISP, and community Wi-Fi could suffer crushing blows.

http://www.internetnews.com/wireless/article/0,,10692_992321,00.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2002   #2 (permalink)
 
Posts: n/a
..from http://80211b.weblogger.com/

..from http://80211b.weblogger.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2002   #3 (permalink)
 
Posts: n/a
NOT SO FAST

Don't get your feathers in a tizzy....there's alot of affected industries, manufacturers and providers with lots of combined revenues and liability at stake....they are all not going to just roll over

the satellite guys will probably have to demonstrate interference problems and extent....

I've been through these rulemakings from my days in the satellite biz, so this is just regular maneuvering
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2002   #4 (permalink)
 
Posts: n/a
Never mind the manufacturers...

What many people seem to be forgetting (including Sirius) is that the backbone of Norht America's distribution system (warehouses, dc's) are also heavily reliant on 802.11 technology. Just imagine the impact if soemone like Walmart has to shut down their warehouse wireless systems, effectively shutting down those distribution centres. Now imagine their legal reaction if anyone suggests that they should do that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2002   #5 (permalink)
 
Posts: n/a
Also,

We should consider the fact that satellite broadcast radio is kind of a dumb idea anyway. Despite the money that has gone into it.

Long live Iridium.

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2002   #6 (permalink)
 
Posts: n/a
this is something i have to laffe at a little.. if it was a real problem woundt they have seen this befor they even design there sats
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2002   #7 (permalink)
 
Posts: n/a
Isn't there a (Santa) clause that reads...

...this device must accept interferrence...???

Lets all just boycott Satallite Radio and make them go bankrupt. Then, we can buy their equipment cheap and set up a global network on their Freq?!

We can call it TronNet or BorgNet! After all, we would have ASSIMILATED their technology! LMFAO!

Tron Of Borg
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2002   #8 (permalink)
 
Posts: n/a
The Motto...

would of course be:

"all your satellite is ours"

I nominate Tron, by vitue of his name, for Chairman of the Borg Board. Can I be CTO/CIO?

LOL,
Thorn

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2002   #9 (permalink)
 
Posts: n/a
Boycott?

I think it's going to be boycotted anyway by nature of its features. (not to mention cost!)

I nominate Thorn for the title of In Their Side.

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2002   #10 (permalink)
 
Posts: n/a
Carbolic,

Hah! Can't agree more. Stupidest thing I've heard of in a long time. I can't figure why people would buy into it. But other things that have caught on that I couldn't see any value in.

This should be fought at every possible turn. Boycott the SOBs and file comments against the plan when the FCC starts requesting public input.

Cheers,
Thorn
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2002   #11 (permalink)
 
Posts: n/a
Nice Source of Stumbling Antennas

I read Intersil's response to FCC 01-278. It was pretty amusing. See my news article.

The Sirius system uses three satellites in conjuction with repeaters located in larger metropolitan areas arranged in a cellular grid, re-using their satellite frequencies. It appears that their link budget has only 6.8dB of link margin built into it. Also, their antennas are spray-painted patch antennas on the rooves of cars.

From what I have seen, their repeaters are trying to fill-in to urban canyons and other dead spots. They are being forced by city governments to use the same sites that cellular providers are using - 8 mile diameter cells. This means that they are going up to four miles with about 10-50 Watts ERP. Any minor source of interference causing any little noise over the dead silence of the Big Bang interferes with these folks.

If the XM repeater and the Sirius repeater are not co-located, the two services will probably desense the mobile's receiver on the adjacent band. This is the same hard lesson that Qualcomm had to learn about CDMA - as the noise floor increases, the cell sizes decrease. And since they don't have variable data rate, there is no signal to recover. The outside of the pie is the largest area of course, so you guessed it. They service has huge dead zones on the fringes of their coverage.

I think they may have problems due to poor RF systems engineering. They are discovering that their systems are marginally engineered and grasping at straws. I don't think they will get the FCC's support to cover up for their mistakes.

Konrad Roeder kroeder@springswireless.com
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.