![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 6
|
I just recently set up a point-to-point bridge for Internet sharing, spanning .6 miles, with quite a few trees in the way. I have a 24Dbi grid antenna on each end mounted aprox 50 ft high. I initally installed 2 D-link DWL-2100AP units in bridge mode, but could not make a link, probably due to the low output (around 32mw).
I then upgraded to a pair of Senao NL-3054CB3 units with 200mw power. I was able to make a link, but was too weak to be useable. I then added a pair of Teletronics amplifiers. This gave me enough power to have a stable connection. But shortly after adding amplification, one of my Senao NL-3054CB3 units went out. Calls to the seller, and the Senao factory rep indicated they were out of these units, and may be several weeks or more, until a replacement unit would be available. I am concidering doing away with the Senao bridge units and going with something a little more readily available and less expensive, such as D-link or Linksys. Since I now have amplification in place, the output of the units are not of concern. I would appreciate any and all recommediations/comments as to which access point/bridge units would be best. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 13
|
have you thought about trying a linksys WAP54G or WRT54g . both of these have open source firmware upgrades from www.sveasoft.com I have the wrt54g and you can increase the output of the antennas from its standard 34mw up to 84mw's. go to their forums and read more about the firmware if you're interested, but with the upgrade in firmware its a really powerful sub 100$ router/ap
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
HAH!
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 68
|
[quote=mlee2]I have a 24Dbi grid antenna on each end mounted aprox 50 ft high. I then upgraded to a pair of Senao NL-3054CB3 units with 200mw power. I then added a pair of Teletronics amplifiers. This gave me enough power to have a stable connection.[quote]
Yeah, and enough power to radiate the neighborhood... Isnt this WAYY above the Max ERP? At least in the united states (and it sounds like any country that would HAVE limits)... 200 mw + amplifier + 24 db + 24db + amplifier + 200 mw... 1 watt amps? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||
|
I amuse you?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,147
|
Quote:
Quote:
P.S. You may want to consider a 900MHZ solution. Last edited by wrzwaldo : 06-19-2004 at 07:11 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
I amuse you?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,147
|
Quote:
So now I have to ask... Did you do the math or just cobble some shit together and hoped it worked? I'm betting you went with the cobble solution. Do you know what power you are allowed in a point-to-point configuration? I think you know enough to be dangerous and thats about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1
|
you do the math with whatever equip you got
Point to point directional is allowed a 24dbm power gain with a 24dbi antenna gain. losses are allowed but the total must not exceed the gains above, this is info taken from a site posted as fcc allowed. Though I don't know if this is per installation, it is the reasonable asumption. If I'm not mistaken usually 500mW translates into 27dbm so there has to be a minimum of 3db loss between cable and connectors and lightning arrestors or whatever, if not the fcc will probably visit and have fun.
|
|
|
|