NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > WiFi Forums > Hardware
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-04-2002   #1 (permalink)
systemd0wn
Probematic Stumbler
 
systemd0wn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 153
great strength, bad quality

I set up my cisco aironet 340 bridge to be an AP. And even when i have the laptop in the same room i have great Strength, but crappy quality. whats up with that? I have tried working on diffrent channels, and that hasnt helped. any ideas?
__________________
Systemd0wn
'311 Transistor, its a lightning resistor'
systemd0wn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2002   #2 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,361
Sounds like interference. Try some or all of the following to see what might help:
-Relocate the AP temporarily in differnet places around the room, or a different room,using a long ethernet cable.
-Reorient the AP antenna(e) if possible. Card antennae tend to be horizontal, and most AP antennae are vertical. This may cause one not to see the signal of the other.
-Try a different card / laptop combination. Borrow a friend's; this can tell if you have a bad card, or the laptop has some problem.
-Check the Aironet manual/help files regarding interference. Most APs have a number of diffenent settings to help mitigate interference issues. Check things like "Frame", "PS mode", etc.

BTW, try having the laptop in a different room. You can be TOO CLOSE to the AP. This can cause interference issues of its own.
__________________
Thorn
"Read Altas Shrugged. Compare it to today. Repeat as necessary"
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2002   #3 (permalink)
systemd0wn
Probematic Stumbler
 
systemd0wn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 153
Thorn, thanks for responding.

i moved the laptop into my office across the building. but its still a straight shot to where the bridge is... if that make sence. the strength went from like 100% almost to 45% (just using the ruber ducky @ the moment) but the signal quality is still 4%. ugh.

i wont be able to try another WNIC becouse i dont have one, and dont know any other person that does.

-tried moving the antenna, didnt help realy.

Ran a multicast test:


Testing link to 004096387907 with 100 multicast packets of size 512

GOOD ( 0% Lost) Time Strength Quality %
msec % In dBm % Out dBm In Out
Sent: 100, Avg: 11 100 52 -69 59 0
Lost to Tgt: 0, Max: 12 100 61 -65 82 0
Lost to Src: 0, Min: 11 100 45 -73 38 0

Rates (Src/Tgt) 1Mb: 100/100


i tried droping the transmit power level from full to '5' and i got a 18%signal quality, but the strength is down to like 20%. at least i can ping the bridge now :P

ugh! if i drop it down to '1' i get signal quality of like 25% but the strength is like 1%...
does the strength matter as long as th signal quality is higher?
__________________
Systemd0wn
'311 Transistor, its a lightning resistor'

Last edited by systemd0wn : 08-05-2002 at 08:28 AM.
systemd0wn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2002   #4 (permalink)
Thunderforge
Registered Member
 
Thunderforge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 342
Well it IS Cisco (I love jabbing them) Could there be anything else in the area causing interference? 2.4GHz cordless phone, microwave? Neighbor with an overpowered antenna blanketing you with interference?

If not, it sounds like something may actually be defective, or on it's way to it. Have you used the card while stumbling at all? Does it get better quality signals then?

You have a Cisco AP, what brand is the card? (This is just curiousity.)
__________________
Back to the forge,
TF
Thunderforge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2002   #5 (permalink)
systemd0wn
Probematic Stumbler
 
systemd0wn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 153
the WNIC is a Cisco Aironet 340 series :P

cisco equipment isnt my pick, its the company's. and that was decided befor i came to work here. :P

i hope the equipment isnt bad. i realy do doubt its that...
__________________
Systemd0wn
'311 Transistor, its a lightning resistor'
systemd0wn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2002   #6 (permalink)
Thunderforge
Registered Member
 
Thunderforge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 342
ok so since it's a Cisco card you aren't stumbling with it. Can you connect to any other APs using some of the prism tools? If so are the quality ratings the same?

Hey if the gear is bad, maybe you can get the company to go with a decent wireless product, like the ORiNOCO family.
__________________
Back to the forge,
TF
Thunderforge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2002   #7 (permalink)
systemd0wn
Probematic Stumbler
 
systemd0wn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 153
we have 2 of these bridges, and 1 cisco isa card that is going into a 2k server. Im getting the same thing on the 2 bridges, today though im going to just get the 2 to bridge only. then put a computer on each side and see what i can get.

and yes, if the crap is broke, orinoco will do just fine
__________________
Systemd0wn
'311 Transistor, its a lightning resistor'
systemd0wn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2002   #8 (permalink)
systemd0wn
Probematic Stumbler
 
systemd0wn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 153
Thumbs up

aight, i got the bridges communicating, etc...

now to take the thing across town. across town being about 1.3-1.5miles heh.

anyway, no real high buildings or anything... the location across town has a

Cisco 12db Omnidirectional
and back here we have a Cisco 21db Dish

the omni ALSO has a 250mw booster on it.
isnt this a little over excesive?! please let me know. how do you figure the reach of an anntenna? i would like to be able to do the math myself. ill search the forums in a bit, have to take this across town. thanks for your help!
__________________
Systemd0wn
'311 Transistor, its a lightning resistor'

Last edited by systemd0wn : 08-05-2002 at 01:28 PM.
systemd0wn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2002   #9 (permalink)
rerunn
rerunn run run
 
rerunn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: way up north
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally posted by systemd0wn
aight, i got the bridges communicating, etc...

Curious to know... what fixed it??
rerunn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2002   #10 (permalink)
lincomatic
Squaaawk! WiFi! WiFi!
 
lincomatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tinsel Town
Posts: 1,682
Quote:
Originally posted by rerunn


Curious to know... what fixed it??
yes, pls systemdown, enlighten us so that we may learn from you as well
__________________
~lincomatic
lincomatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2002   #11 (permalink)
systemd0wn
Probematic Stumbler
 
systemd0wn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 153
i do think it was that WNIC becouse once i got the 2 bridges communicating (wich wasnt a prob.) i checked the stats on those and everything was great... I took it out to the other location and they are NOT associating though I did find this tool (im sure everyone has it):

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/102/us-calc.xls

anyway, it should reach even without the amp it should work fine. i have a feeling the guy who set it up first didnt get the dish's running with a line of sight. the trees seem to be in the way in town. going to take some binoculars or something up their and check the shizal out. :P

duno if that helped anyone.
if it is the line of sight ill let you guys know. thanks
__________________
Systemd0wn
'311 Transistor, its a lightning resistor'
systemd0wn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.