NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > WiFi Forums > Hardware
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-29-2005   #1 (permalink)
jimmy1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5
Help with new Wi-Fi network

Hello,

I have had this dropped in my lap to fix and could really use some help.

Here is what I have;

Setting up a wi-fi to share a broadband network connection. Direcway connection is hooked up to a Linksys WRT54G router which is connected to a computer useing Windows 2000 Pro. I have changed the router firmware to the firmware from Hyperwrt, so I can set the Tx/RX antenna and output power. The external antenna is a Hyperlink Tech 15db Omni 2.4Ghz on a 40' tower, connected with LMR-400 cable.

The first Wi-fi station is about 1200 to 1500 ft away with clear line of sight. The station is useing a Hyperlink 12Db yagi antenna connected to a Wrt54G router connected to a computer useing Windows XP.

Problem I have is not signal! Have also tried a Hyperlink 12Db omni antenna at the main site with no change.

Can anyone tell if my setup is wrong (IE wrong equipment) or is in the setup. We have tried several router configurements that we have found over the internet.

Any one willing to help me out ?

Thanks in advance, Jim
jimmy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005   #2 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,358
Did someone with RF experience actually design this first or was it just thrown together?
* Have you computed the Link Buget?
* Is the "clear line of sight" true RF LOS?
* Is the FZ clear?
* Typically 12dBi and 15dBi omnidirection antennae have very flat patterns, usually around 5º and 3º respectively. Have you computed if it's overshooting?

Basically, have you done the math?

(FYI: it's "dB", not db or Db.)
__________________
Thorn
"Read Altas Shrugged. Compare it to today. Repeat as necessary"
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005   #3 (permalink)
jimmy1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5
Help with new Wi-Fi network

Hello Thorn,

I am sure the original person did not have any experience, he said he did and that he did his homework. Now I have a lot of eq. and nothing works.

Tried to find out about Link Buget? Can you direct me to where I can learn what to do.

As far as the line of sight. I can see both antenna's, they are clear of everything nothing between them. We are in the country so there should be no RF los. Both atenna'a are within about 10' of each other in height. Even at 3 degrees it should be fine.

One more thing, I have found software for lap tops that have signal streight meters but have not been able to find one to work with my setup here, any thoughts?

Thanks for taking the time to help,
Jim


Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorn
Did someone with RF experience actually design this first or was it just thrown together?
* Have you computed the Link Buget?
* Is the "clear line of sight" true RF LOS?
* Is the FZ clear?
* Typically 12dBi and 15dBi omnidirection antennae have very flat patterns, usually around 5º and 3º respectively. Have you computed if it's overshooting?

Basically, have you done the math?

(FYI: it's "dB", not db or Db.)
jimmy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005   #4 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmy1
Hello Thorn,

I am sure the original person did not have any experience, he said he did and that he did his homework. Now I have a lot of eq. and nothing works.

Tried to find out about Link Buget? Can you direct me to where I can learn what to do.

As far as the line of sight. I can see both antenna's, they are clear of everything nothing between them. We are in the country so there should be no RF los. Both atenna'a are within about 10' of each other in height. Even at 3 degrees it should be fine.

One more thing, I have found software for lap tops that have signal streight meters but have not been able to find one to work with my setup here, any thoughts?

Thanks for taking the time to help,
Jim

Google comes to mind. You can also look Here.

What does that have to do with the price of rice in china?

Yes

I see a lot of "should" but no numbers to back them up.

Last edited by wrzwaldo : 03-29-2005 at 11:44 AM.
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005   #5 (permalink)
beakmyn
Free Public Wifi
 
beakmyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrzwaldo
Google comes to mind. You can also look Here.

What does that have to do with the price of rice in china?

Yes

I see a lot of "should" but no numbers to back them up.
Quote:
We are in the country so there should be no RF los.
I think he meant that cows are short.
__________________
┌──────────────────────────────┐
NS Icons Explained|et hoc genus omne
└──────────────────────────────┘


Creating yesterday's future, Today!
beakmyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005   #6 (permalink)
streaker69
Psychic Amish Stumbler
 
streaker69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 12,239
There could be RF loss because of all the silent Black Army Helicoptors hovering around, plus all the Cattle Mutilatin' Aliens nearby.
__________________
Treat your gun like your genitals, only whip it out when it's absolutely necessary.
streaker69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005   #7 (permalink)
wiresalot
Registered Member
 
wiresalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Slightly off center.
Posts: 484
Hello Jimmy1

From what you are saying the 40' tower antenae is conected to the wireless router with IMR-400 cable?? IMR-400 seems to have a .19dB loss per foot did you factor that in the footage from the antenae to the router?
wiresalot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005   #8 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmy1
Tried to find out about Link Buget? Can you direct me to where I can learn what to do.
There are lots of good calculators out on the web. Try a couple, as they may give slightly different type of information.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmy1
As far as the line of sight. I can see both antenna's, they are clear of everything nothing between them. We are in the country so there should be no RF los.
First off is is not "'RF los" (as in a typographical error on 'loss'.) It is RF-LOS (Radio Frequency Line Of Sight), and that is far different thing than visual Line Of Sight. Just because the you can see from one antenna to the other does not mean the radio signals can actually move between the antennae. This is why I asked you about FZ (Fresnel Zone). That must be clear or no signal will get through.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmy1
Both atenna'a are within about 10' of each other in height. Even at 3 degrees it should be fine.
3º at 1200 ft is pretty narrow. Again, to be sure, you need to do the math.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmy1
One more thing, I have found software for lap tops that have signal streight meters but have not been able to find one to work with my setup here, any thoughts?
You won't find software meter for an AP, or at least I've never seen one. Either get a hardware meter that can be inline ($$$), or swap out each AP for a laptop while you tune the system.
__________________
Thorn
"Read Altas Shrugged. Compare it to today. Repeat as necessary"
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005   #9 (permalink)
wiresalot
Registered Member
 
wiresalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Slightly off center.
Posts: 484
it should be +/- 60' at 1200' 3degree ang.
wiresalot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005   #10 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiresalot
it should be +/- 60' at 1200' 3degree ang.
What does that mean?

If you are going to continue to post, please read the Welcome Desk threads.
__________________
Thorn
"Read Altas Shrugged. Compare it to today. Repeat as necessary"
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005   #11 (permalink)
wiresalot
Registered Member
 
wiresalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Slightly off center.
Posts: 484
Cool

From mathematical equations using geometry the spread of a 3 degree angle at 1200 feet would be 63 feet 10 inches. This would be within his 10 foot offset between antenna hights. I do not feel his anteneas are wrong, and the line of site is not the problem, but I feel feeding that type of an antenna thru a LMR-400 cable of a unknown distance (40' tower plus the lenth to the router) with a linksys WRT45G is. The output on the WRT45G is not enough to feed that type of set up. Jimmy1 should think about an in line amplifier at his "main site". Of course being satelite you may have to follow the directions at "http://testmy.net/topic-1480" to host your WAN.


Jimmy1,
I hope this helps you.
wiresalot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005   #12 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiresalot
From mathematical equations using geometry the spread of a 3 degree angle at 1200 feet would be 63 feet 10 inches. This would be within his 10 foot offset between antenna hights. I do not feel his anteneas are wrong, and the line of site is not the problem, but I feel feeding that type of an antenna thru a LMR-400 cable of a unknown distance (40' tower plus the lenth to the router) with a linksys WRT45G is. The output on the WRT45G is not enough to feed that type of set up. Jimmy1 should think about an in line amplifier at his "main site". Of course being satelite you may have to follow the directions at "http://testmy.net/topic-1480" to host your WAN.


Jimmy1,
I hope this helps you.
Thats the reason it has been said he needs to "do the math". One could dink around with what if's and should's all day and never get a stable of even working link. Also in one of your earlier posts you said that IMR-400 (you did mean LMR?) has .19db of loss per foot? That seems a little high where did you get that data? the datasheet shows it in the neighborhood of .066 per foot (6.6 per 100 feet). The datasheet show it at 19 per 100 meters.

Last edited by wrzwaldo : 03-29-2005 at 10:23 PM.
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005   #13 (permalink)
streaker69
Psychic Amish Stumbler
 
streaker69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Virginville, BlueBall, Bird In Hand, Intercourse, Paradise, PA
Posts: 12,239
Wiresalot,

That is a good point about the distance with the LMR400 cable and line loss through the cable, but wouldn't it be wiser for him to consider moving his AP to the top of the tower and enclose it in a weather proof box? I've seen pictures of those types of setups and then you wouldn't be introducing yet another piece of hardware to fail, and the potential for noise through the inline amplifier.
__________________
Treat your gun like your genitals, only whip it out when it's absolutely necessary.
streaker69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005   #14 (permalink)
wiresalot
Registered Member
 
wiresalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Slightly off center.
Posts: 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by streaker69
Wiresalot,

That is a good point about the distance with the LMR400 cable and line loss through the cable, but wouldn't it be wiser for him to consider moving his AP to the top of the tower and enclose it in a weather proof box? I've seen pictures of those types of setups and then you wouldn't be introducing yet another piece of hardware to fail, and the potential for noise through the inline amplifier.
Yes, That would be the best set up, but I have seen "weather proof" enclosures that were not up to my par and failed any how, I have no idea how much jimmy1 knows on this subject. If we new he was only trying to feed on remote location I would suggest flate panel antennes, but I think he may, In the future decide to add an other(s) remote stations, If not why would he be using an omni directional antenna at his "main site"?
wiresalot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2005   #15 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiresalot
Yes, That would be the best set up, but I have seen "weather proof" enclosures that were not up to my par and failed any how, I have no idea how much jimmy1 knows on this subject. If we new he was only trying to feed on remote location I would suggest flate panel antennes, but I think he may, In the future decide to add an other(s) remote stations, If not why would he be using an omni directional antenna at his "main site"?

Yet another reason to push doing the math. With amps comes the greater possibility of exceeding the "legal" power limits in the license free ISM bands. And there are different power levels allowed for point-to-point and point-to-multipoint installations.
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.