NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > WiFi Forums > Hardware
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-05-2004   #1 (permalink)
spaceape
Registered Member
 
spaceape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Geosynchronous Orbit
Posts: 8
Orinoco/Proxim card tests

I was going to post this into my original thread (inquiring about opinions on the Orinoco/Proxim cards), but it was tossed into the newbie bin...

I thought some users might find this information helpful (I would have). I tested the following cards under both XP and W2K, using latest drivers and netstumbler 0.3.30:

- Orinoco 802.11b Classic Gold PCMCIA works great (we all know this by now).
- Orinoco/Proxim 802.11b/g Gold ("businessman" logo) works great, and its drivers are better than the previous card.
- Orinoco/Proxim 802.11a/b/g Gold - this worked but was clearly not compatible with netstumbler. I was able to get accurate SNR information, but was unable to differentiate between the a signal band and the b/g signal band (probably due to existing incompatibility, as said in other threads). Noithing crashed though!

Overall I'm pretty satisfied, and appreciate some of the comments I got earlier. I'm now going to try to get Ethereal to work for these cards...
spaceape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004   #2 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,359
Sigh.

It's good that you got these working in your machines, but please keep in mind that if it not supported, you should properly be saying "it works with NS, right now, in this particular machine."

To say anything else is misleading.

The fact of the matter is, that if a given card is not supported, then it should be regarded with suspicion.

Because of the nature of the various chipsets and the NDIS 5.1 drivers, an unsupported card that works great for you at the moment may fail miserably the next time you boot up, and it may never work at all for someone using an "identical" machine. This is why we make such a big deal on these forums about supported vs. unsupported cards.

Look around, and you'll find many threads along the lines of "I was using a brand X card. It's been working for three weeks and suddenly quit..."

The Orinoco/Proxim 802.11b/g Gold Model 8420 ("Businessman") is one of the biggest offenders in this catagory.

Only the supported cards (i.e. Hermes chipset) work 100% of the time NS 0.3.0 and with any Windows OS.
__________________
Thorn
"Read Altas Shrugged. Compare it to today. Repeat as necessary"
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004   #3 (permalink)
spaceape
Registered Member
 
spaceape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Geosynchronous Orbit
Posts: 8
agreed

Yes, I totally agree. I'm by no means saying these cards are or should be supported. I'm only answering my original question - if someone REALLY wants to try and use NS with this a/b/g card - it is possible.

I'm going through the process of installing and mapping a enterprise-scale a/b/g network, and therefore was curious about a/b/g compatibility. I'm just posting my findings.

Thanks for the software.
spaceape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004   #4 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,359
Re: agreed

Quote:
Originally posted by spaceape
Yes, I totally agree. I'm by no means saying these cards are or should be supported. I'm only answering my original question - if someone REALLY wants to try and use NS with this a/b/g card - it is possible.

I'm going through the process of installing and mapping a enterprise-scale a/b/g network, and therefore was curious about a/b/g compatibility. I'm just posting my findings.
...
Understood, I just wanted to make it clear to others that may read this thread, that there are no gaurantees with anything other than the HERMES cards.

Good luck with your maping project.

Quote:
Originally posted by spaceape
... Thanks for the software.
You seem to have me confused with Marius. He's the author, and deserves the real thanks. I just "work" here.
__________________
Thorn
"Read Altas Shrugged. Compare it to today. Repeat as necessary"
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004   #5 (permalink)
ZipperSeven
...killed Darth Plaigus
 
ZipperSeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL = Lower Georgia
Posts: 261
Well, and you would be able to detect 802.11b/g access points with supported hardware, since the g specification implies backwards compatibility with the b spec.

For the a, I guess you wander around with your client software open to see if it finds something. Sounds kind of crappy, but I couldnt find anyone working on a Netstumbler-like project for cards other than the Orinoco clones.
__________________
...from slashdot:

Quote:
Go over to the NetStumbler Forums if you want to see a prime example of moderators who simply do not take ANY shit from ANYone.
ZipperSeven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004   #6 (permalink)
EVH-rocks
Registered Member
 
EVH-rocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: remote scottish highlands (after leaving therpalm trees of torquay in the english rivierra Brrr chilly man!
Posts: 149
I just googled NDIS as I have been wondering if there is any difference to the various drivers.

I am using the driver supplied by XP vers 7.43.0.9 (2001) as the disc supplied with my lucent orinoco gold does not have xp drivers.

From what I read on google NDIS is a standard interface driver for network cards and im guessing that all the drivers use these instructions, or is this not true.

I ask as when searching the forums mention is made of the NDIS driver as opposed to another type of orinoco driver.

eg NS works fine with the **** driver and the ndis 5.1 driver

are Ndis drivers mostly supplied by the company on disc/download sites or is it just an alternate way people have of describing the various drivers out there.

thanks and sorry for the dumbass question. Im usually lurking on here erading new and old posts.
__________________
'We havent had that spirit here since 1969'
EVH-rocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004   #7 (permalink)
spaceape
Registered Member
 
spaceape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Geosynchronous Orbit
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally posted by ZipperSeven
For the a, I guess you wander around with your client software open to see if it finds something. Sounds kind of crappy, but I couldnt find anyone working on a Netstumbler-like project for cards other than the Orinoco clones.
See that's the thing though - I can detect 802.11a AP's with this setup - I configured one of the AP's (it's a Foundry IronPoint 200) to only use it's 802.11a radio - and NS picked up the signal as channel 56, and gave accurate stats on it.

What was most surprising to me is that when both radios are on, NS picks up on the 802.11a radio SSID instead of the 802.11b's. Like I said, it's buggy, but you can definitely pick up the signals.

I hope this is helpful info, I definitely don't mean to be rockin' the boat!
spaceape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004   #8 (permalink)
ZipperSeven
...killed Darth Plaigus
 
ZipperSeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL = Lower Georgia
Posts: 261
I stand corrected.

My other thought is...wow...channel 56!

LOL
__________________
...from slashdot:

Quote:
Go over to the NetStumbler Forums if you want to see a prime example of moderators who simply do not take ANY shit from ANYone.
ZipperSeven is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.