NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > WiFi Forums > Hardware
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-20-2003   #1 (permalink)
Jerry507
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Urbandale or Ames, IA
Posts: 7
Orinoco solution?

I ran into some problems last night while I was out stumbling and I came up with a solution for what I believe to be the bug everyone talks about...

When I started, my card wasen't detecting any APs even though other laptops in the car were and I couldn't figure out why. The behavior continued when I downloaded the latest version of NS.

I found out that if you create a new profile that has a blank SSID, NS works and picks up stuff normally. The downside is that (I think) it automatically tries to connect every time you find a new AP. However, unless you are stopping or something in order to actually try to connect I don't think it will be a problem since it won't finish before you are out of range.

I hope this helps people, it sure helps me. My university has a lot of APs around with non-standard names (department ones arn't required to use the IASTATE ssid like university ones) so NS was the only way I had to easily connect to APs without changing the profile every time. Plus the department ones arn't put up on maps. Very annoying.

One other thing, this works even if you leave the reconfigure option ON. I guess it's just another solution but it seems easier to me, it seems to get around a lot of the steps everyone here has like turning off tcp/ip and stuff.

Although I bet I'll still get flamed anyway. Oh well.

Last edited by Jerry507 : 09-20-2003 at 08:16 PM.
Jerry507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2003   #2 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,361
Not a flame, but...

Actually, the preferred SSID is "ANY" as per the specifications of the 802.11b Standard. A blank SSID is better than your own or a default, but may not work correctly with all APs that you will come across. This is discussed a lot, and is a common newbie mistake. However, it's good that you're trying different settings.

For routine stumbling, you should still disable TCP/IP (and any other network protocols) for legal reasons. This is because you do not want to actually connect to the network. As has been said many times, actual connection to a network without authorization or permission is illegal. Disabling the networking protocols prevents even an inadvertant connection.

No protocols = no connections = no illegal actions.
__________________
Thorn
"Read Altas Shrugged. Compare it to today. Repeat as necessary"
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2003   #3 (permalink)
Jerry507
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Urbandale or Ames, IA
Posts: 7
Not really a newbie either, I just dropped stumbling for a long time because of college. Then after I needed it again, this annoying problem came up.

And wouldn't associating to an AP still constitute a connection by someone anal enough to actually want to prosecute you? You're still establishing a connection, although not nearly as major as something like TCP.

But then don't you get into varying levels of illegal and it all becomes moot?
Jerry507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2003   #4 (permalink)
gmiller220
People are dumb
 
gmiller220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 466
Quote:
Originally posted by Jerry507
Not really a newbie either, I just dropped stumbling for a long time because of college. Then after I needed it again, this annoying problem came up.

And wouldn't associating to an AP still constitute a connection by someone anal enough to actually want to prosecute you? You're still establishing a connection, although not nearly as major as something like TCP.

But then don't you get into varying levels of illegal and it all becomes moot?
Netstumbler does NOT associate to an ap. It sends out a broadcast request per 802.11 standards and the ap per 802.11 standards responds to that broadcast. Unless the ap has ssid broadcast disabled that is.
gmiller220 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2003   #5 (permalink)
Thorn
Did you do the math?
 
Thorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,361
Quote:
Originally posted by Jerry507
Not really a newbie either, I just dropped stumbling for a long time because of college. Then after I needed it again, this annoying problem came up.

And wouldn't associating to an AP still constitute a connection by someone anal enough to actually want to prosecute you? You're still establishing a connection, although not nearly as major as something like TCP.

But then don't you get into varying levels of illegal and it all becomes moot?
NS does not associate. Association take place at the client manager level. As gmiller states, it sends out a broadcast request and the AP standards responds. In essence, it merely sends out an "Anybody around?" message and the AP responds "I am. My name is..." That's all.

BTW, I would have any improper network access (wired or wireless) criminally prosecuted in a heartbeat. It isn't anal, it just make sense. It is no different than having a burglar or embezzler prosecuted. Someone has stolen from me, and deserves to be punished.
__________________
Thorn
"Read Altas Shrugged. Compare it to today. Repeat as necessary"
Thorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2003   #6 (permalink)
Jerry507
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Urbandale or Ames, IA
Posts: 7
I realize NS itself does not prompt the card to associate because it has very little interaction with the card at all, but leaving the SSID of your machine set to ANY or blank will still cause the card to connect to the first possible AP.

By anal, I was refering to people would would prosecute you based on the connection established as you're driving by. Obviously we would all try to get someone using our internet connections to download bad stuff, but there are also people out there who would take you to the mat over a DHCP lease, or if they understood, even associating to their AP.

And the association could be considered just as illegal as getting a DHCP lease, or sending a packet over the internet.
Jerry507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2003   #7 (permalink)
gmiller220
People are dumb
 
gmiller220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 466
Quote:
Originally posted by Jerry507
I realize NS itself does not prompt the card to associate because it has very little interaction with the card at all, but leaving the SSID of your machine set to ANY or blank will still cause the card to connect to the first possible AP.

By anal, I was refering to people would would prosecute you based on the connection established as you're driving by. Obviously we would all try to get someone using our internet connections to download bad stuff, but there are also people out there who would take you to the mat over a DHCP lease, or if they understood, even associating to their AP.

And the association could be considered just as illegal as getting a DHCP lease, or sending a packet over the internet.
Hence the reason thorn stated the following:

Quote:
For routine stumbling, you should still disable TCP/IP (and any other network protocols) for legal reasons. This is because you do not want to actually connect to the network. As has been said many times, actual connection to a network without authorization or permission is illegal. Disabling the networking protocols prevents even an inadvertant connection.

No protocols = no connections = no illegal actions.
gmiller220 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2003   #8 (permalink)
Jerry507
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Urbandale or Ames, IA
Posts: 7
Disabling TCP/IP isn't going to stop your card from associating.
Jerry507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2003   #9 (permalink)
G8tK33per
Asshole Emeritus
 
G8tK33per's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Goomba's Booty Boardwalk
Posts: 6,128
Quote:
Originally posted by Jerry507
Disabling TCP/IP isn't going to stop your card from associating.
Obviously, judging by your tenure on this planet, you've become a networking genius.
Go play somewhere else, junior.
__________________
"My mind is aglow with whirling, transient nodes of thought careening through a cosmic vapor of invention."

Sons of Confederate Veterans
G8tK33per is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2003   #10 (permalink)
gmiller220
People are dumb
 
gmiller220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 466
Quote:
Originally posted by Jerry507
Disabling TCP/IP isn't going to stop your card from associating.
HA HA HA HA HA HA
gmiller220 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003   #11 (permalink)
Jerry507
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Urbandale or Ames, IA
Posts: 7
Woah, I've obviously stepped into the alpha males den or something. I didn't mean to be offensive I was just simply stating that disabling tcp/ip won't stop your card from associating with an AP.

This is how it works with my card/laptop, a C600 running 2k pro with an orinoco gold. Why would disabling a software protocol stop the hardware level stuff from doing it's job? If you disable tcp/ip on a network card in your computer, can you still not use the myriad of other protocols that exist that don't use it?

If I pissed ANYONE off, I'm sorry. It wasen't my intention. I just wanted to point out that a connection exists anyway, and atleast with Windows, the client software will still connect automatically whenever it finds an AP with a strong enough signal.
Jerry507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003   #12 (permalink)
TheSovereign
Master of the universe
 
TheSovereign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: chicago
Posts: 658
ok real quick lesson in networking
ok its the network card priority to associate
EVEN IF THE CLIENT MANAGER ISNT LOADED!
the card will simply associate this is out of your control and i doubt u can be charged

disabling your tcp/ip is just a way of making sure nothing is injected or recieved into a network that isnt yours
__________________
SO SAYS TheSovereign
TheSovereign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003   #13 (permalink)
Jerry507
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Urbandale or Ames, IA
Posts: 7
I realize that, the only reason I pointed it out was Thorn said someone accessing your network (with TCP/IP on) was the same as someone plugging in.

I was merely saying that if you went by the standard of plugging in, then the association process would be just as illegal.

Though I guess it's quite moot when you consider 99.999999% of the people out there have no way of telling if you associated or not.

--edit--
I wonder if nix OS's automatically associate....

Last edited by Jerry507 : 09-24-2003 at 08:05 PM.
Jerry507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003   #14 (permalink)
gmiller220
People are dumb
 
gmiller220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 466
Quote:
Originally posted by Jerry507
I realize that, the only reason I pointed it out was Thorn said someone accessing your network (with TCP/IP on) was the same as someone plugging in.

I was merely saying that if you went by the standard of plugging in, then the association process would be just as illegal.

Though I guess it's quite moot when you consider 99.999999% of the people out there have no way of telling if you associated or not.

--edit--
I wonder if nix OS's automatically associate....
Nope. Nix is a bitch to configure but once you get it going it's all right. (Redhat 9 makes it easy to connect your wireless nic though but no auto association) Plus kismet is great because it's a passive scanner meaning it doesn't send out any requests it just sits there and listens.
gmiller220 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2003   #15 (permalink)
Youbecha
Registered Member
 
Youbecha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 29
Uh, back to the subject.

I can't speak for all cards, but mine (Dell Truemobile 1150 Orinoco Gold rebadge) also has the client software that needs to have a default mode..

The rest of the story is that the client manager should NOT be running while stumbling, or it will try to log into networks it sees.

In fact I never run the client software unless I need to change the settings (like from stumbling to networking).

That should solve at least part of one problem.
Youbecha is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.