![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
OH such tacos will I give
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,049
|
Heh. 110 horspower.
__________________
A good way to threaten somebody is to light a stick of dynamite. Then you call the guy and hold the burning fuse up to the phone. "Hear that?" you say. "That's dynamite, baby." -Jack Handey |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 185
|
OK, heres the deal,
Think of your wireless card a man, and the antenna as a woman. Now some guys get along better with some types of women, and not with others, and even with a woman that he really really likes, and for the most part gets along with, sometimes, in the wrong situation, even though they like each other they don't perform well. (wink wink). Now think of the external antenna as a mistress. You will always get better performance out of the mistress, and there are a number of different ones available, depending on the job that needs to be done (WINK WINK). In some situations you want a really tall one, and sometimes you just need something to get you by. So you have a number of different (ahem) antennas, that will do a different job, and all of them perform differently. (Thank god). BUT REMEMBER, you never really know what one is going to do until you hook it up, but you can usually get an idea of how well it will work by looking at it. A really good sign is when other wirelees cards start staring at yer antenna. Bottom line, and external antenna is almost always better than the original, and performance varies by the antenna, and the situation. I really dunno what came over me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Did you do the math?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,358
|
Quote:
![]() The antenna that is shown is rated at 5dB. That means that a given signal should be "boosted" by 5dB. A 3dB increase in signal is a 100% increase over the existing signal. FYI: The "15%" that your machine is reporting is pretty useless, as there is no reference to compare to (15% of what?) Don't speak radio? Don't have the foggiest idea what a dB is? Read this.
__________________
Thorn "Read Altas Shrugged. Compare it to today. Repeat as necessary" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
I amuse you?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,147
|
Quote:
Yes and No. It just depends (on more things than I care to get into right now). Weather, LOS, and the such. Go read the thread that Thorn posted. Hint look for the word "this" WW Last edited by wrzwaldo : 02-16-2004 at 10:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Did you do the math?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,358
|
Quote:
52dBm [signal] + (5dBi [antenna isotopic gain] - 2dBm*) = 55dBm [observed signal] *Just take my word for it right now. If you want to learn more google for "isotopic", "antenna", "dBi" and "dBd".
__________________
Thorn "Read Altas Shrugged. Compare it to today. Repeat as necessary" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Did you do the math?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Villa Straylight
Posts: 10,358
|
Quote:
And I have to correct myself from last night: Since signal is stronger as you approach 0, the correct observation would be about -49dBm (which is still a 100% signal increase in gain.) So the corrected equation should be: -52dBm [signal] + (5dBi [antenna isotopic gain] - 2dBm*) = -49dBm [observed signal] *Again, the isotopic antenna correction. I must have been more tired than I thought last night to make such an obvious mistake.
__________________
Thorn "Read Altas Shrugged. Compare it to today. Repeat as necessary" |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|