NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > WiFi Forums > Hardware
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2005   #1 (permalink)
Starpoint
Pr0nStumbler Expert Level
 
Starpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,536
Question for the Masses

I was asked in a PM about that Airlink card and its milliwatt power levels, so I got out its very limited manual and the box and looked

here is what I got from the box

The spec's on it show 3.3 volt with 520 milliamp on the TX and 425 milliamp on the RX as the consumption rate

Using these specs and the formula of volts x amps = wattage
3.3 x .520 amps = 1.716 watts on the TX side
3.3 x .425 amps = 1.4025 watts on the RX side.
This correct?

I think thats kinda HIGH on the power.




I got an email out to them asking about it so when I get the feedback I will post.
__________________
Against the run of the mill, static as it seems

We break the surface tension with our wild kinetic dreams
Curves and lines -- of grand designs...


Tonight's movie "Soylent Green" has been brought to you by our sponsor - Waste Management

My mind is like a Steel trap - Rusty and Illegal in most states
Starpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005   #2 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starpoint
I was asked in a PM about that Airlink card and its milliwatt power levels, so I got out its very limited manual and the box and looked

here is what I got from the box

The spec's on it show 3.3 volt with 520 milliamp on the TX and 425 milliamp on the RX as the consumption rate

Using these specs and the formula of volts x amps = wattage
3.3 x .520 amps = 1.716 watts on the TX side
3.3 x .425 amps = 1.4025 watts on the RX side.
This correct?

I think thats kinda HIGH on the power.





I got an email out to them asking about it so when I get the feedback I will post.
What you are looking at there is the power consumption for TX and RX. I don't think you can directly cross that to available transmit power.
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005   #3 (permalink)
beakmyn
Free Public Wifi
 
beakmyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,992
This shows the Airlink as 15dBm (31.6mW) which sounds about right.
__________________
┌──────────────────────────────┐
NS Icons Explained|et hoc genus omne
└──────────────────────────────┘


Creating yesterday's future, Today!
beakmyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005   #4 (permalink)
Starpoint
Pr0nStumbler Expert Level
 
Starpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrzwaldo
What you are looking at there is the power consumption for TX and RX. I don't think you can directly cross that to available transmit power.
That is all the tech specs they have given and I think my math is correct which is why I think the wattage I posted is too high.

I am still waiting for them to get back to me on the TX and RX milliwatts.
__________________
Against the run of the mill, static as it seems

We break the surface tension with our wild kinetic dreams
Curves and lines -- of grand designs...


Tonight's movie "Soylent Green" has been brought to you by our sponsor - Waste Management

My mind is like a Steel trap - Rusty and Illegal in most states
Starpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005   #5 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starpoint
That is all the tech specs they have given and I think my math is correct which is why I think the wattage I posted is too high.

I am still waiting for them to get back to me on the TX and RX milliwatts.
You won't get RX (sensitivity) in milliwats. It will probably be in dBm. If your math is correct (I didn't check) then the wattage is correct, but it is wattage required to drive the radio not the final RF output. Repeat, those numbers do not correlate into any TX power or RX sensitivity number (other than that's the power the radio draws to function at the specified levels).

Last edited by wrzwaldo : 08-31-2005 at 12:27 PM.
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005   #6 (permalink)
Starpoint
Pr0nStumbler Expert Level
 
Starpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrzwaldo
You won't get RX (sensitivity) in milliwats. It will probably be in dBm. If your math is correct (I didn't check) then the wattage is correct, but it is wattage required to drive the radio not the final RF output. Repeat, those numbers do not correlate into any TX power or RX sensitivity number (other than that's the power the radio draws to function at the specified levels).

got feedback from them, and they say my findings is correct...

Now if the TX and RX power outputs are about 40-50% of the consumption then this is a powerful card.. even at 30-45% of the consumption.
__________________
Against the run of the mill, static as it seems

We break the surface tension with our wild kinetic dreams
Curves and lines -- of grand designs...


Tonight's movie "Soylent Green" has been brought to you by our sponsor - Waste Management

My mind is like a Steel trap - Rusty and Illegal in most states
Starpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005   #7 (permalink)
Starpoint
Pr0nStumbler Expert Level
 
Starpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by beakmyn
This shows the Airlink as 15dBm (31.6mW) which sounds about right.

That link shows the 3010 as a 15dBm card.. the 3025 has no listed spec there.

here is a pic of the client showing signal levels

Notice the signal level as -42/0 it will vary on my setup from -39 to about
-48
Attached Images
File Type: jpg airlinkclient.jpg (42.3 KB, 38 views)
__________________
Against the run of the mill, static as it seems

We break the surface tension with our wild kinetic dreams
Curves and lines -- of grand designs...


Tonight's movie "Soylent Green" has been brought to you by our sponsor - Waste Management

My mind is like a Steel trap - Rusty and Illegal in most states
Starpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005   #8 (permalink)
wrzwaldo
I amuse you?
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 9,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starpoint
That link shows the 3010 as a 15dBm card.. the 3025 has no listed spec there.

here is a pic of the client showing signal levels

Notice the signal level as -42/0 it will vary on my setup from -39 to about
-48

If you look at this pdf it clearly states that the 3025 transmit power is 15dBm (OFDM) and 17dBm (CCK). Receive sensitivty is -93dBm @ 1 Mbps.
wrzwaldo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.