NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > WiFi Forums > Hardware
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-23-2004   #1 (permalink)
s'ung_q10_owner
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Samsung Q10 & ORiNOCO mini PCI

Hi All,

I have recently acquired a Samsung Q10 (same as Dell Latitude X200 and Gateway 200) for a good price - running Win2K.

It came with built in wireless lan, which is an ORiNOCO mini PCI card.

The laptop is fine, but the wlan doesn't work. I've upgraded to the most recent drivers available from agere, and Windows Device Manager claims everything is working fine - but it doesn't see my and my neighbours wlans. Plugging in a DWL-650+ and D-Link drivers works fine.

Netstumbler 0.4.0 build 554 works fine with the DWL-650+, but sees no APs when using NDIS 5 or ORiNOCO direct.

The antenna is plugged into the card (I checked). There is only one antenna lead.

The Agere client utility reports:

Utility
Client Manager Variant 1 Version 3.30

Driver
NDIS5 Miniport Driver Variant 2 Version 7.82

Card
ORiNOCO Mini PCI card Variant 4 Version 5.00
Encryption capabilities WEP+128 RC4
Maximum Data Rate 11 Mbit/s
Serial Number 03UT09505717

Firmware
Primary Functions firmware Variant 1 Version 4.04
Station Functions formware Variant 2 Version 9.42

Is there anything else I can check or do, or do I have to accept I have a broken card? If so, what mini PCI card would people recommend I get for this laptop?

Thaks in advance for any replies

s'ung_q10_owner
s'ung_q10_owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2004   #2 (permalink)
Rotifer
Registered Member
 
Rotifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 42
check your leads

Did you check to see if the single internal lead is hooked into the RF main jack? i made that mistake when i bought the internal wlan card for my toshiba

also was this an ebay deal? some notebooks will not accept a wlan board that is of different manufacturer
__________________
When the Going gets tough, Lower your standards.
Rotifer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2004   #3 (permalink)
s'ung_q10_owner
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Believe so - will recheck

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotifer
Did you check to see if the single internal lead is hooked into the RF main jack? i made that mistake when i bought the internal wlan card for my toshiba

also was this an ebay deal? some notebooks will not accept a wlan board that is of different manufacturer
I believe it is, but I will re-check. From memory, there are two antenna attachment points on the card - something like MAIN and AUX, and the single antenna lead is attached to the MAIN socket.

It was bought from a store, not eBay, or any other auction site, so I believe the card to be 'oem'. I'm likely to want to replace the card anyway at some point.

Thanks for the reply.
s'ung_q10_owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004   #4 (permalink)
s'ung_q10_owner
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
An update for those interested (if anybody).

I tried booting the Q10 with the recently available single CD Linux distribution "Knoppix V3.4-2004-05-17-EN" (see www.knopper.net).

This boots successfully from the firewire-attached internal CD-ROM, and amazingly, successfully uses the internal wireless card!

This is unusual in finding a Linux driver than works better than the Windows driver (it's usually the other way round).

Even better, it used 128bit WEP, which the card specs say it doesn't do!!!

So I've confirmed that the hardware works (like a charm), so it's either a Win 2k driver problem or a configuration problem.

Any ideas what to do next?

Regards

s'ung_q10_owner
s'ung_q10_owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004   #5 (permalink)
peekitty
Macaca
 
peekitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 1,056
Don't badmouth the penguin!

Quote:
Originally Posted by s'ung_q10_owner
This is unusual in finding a Linux driver than works better than the Windows driver (it's usually the other way round).
And did Knoppix prompt you for driver discs, or launch "new hardware detected" wizards? No, because all the other drivers for your laptop are already there. It wouldn't go as smoothly if you were doing a new install of Win2000 or god forbid, WinME. Actually, you probably have an 2000 install in your future, if removing the card from device manager and reinstalling it doesn't help (it will reuse the current driver,) you'll probably find that a format & reinstall will do the trick.
peekitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004   #6 (permalink)
Barry
Managing the iTards.
 
Barry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,882
knoppix-hdinstall

Requires Windoze 2000 or better, choose better, install Linux!!
__________________
Never do anything you don't want to explain to the paramedics.
Barry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2004   #7 (permalink)
s'ung_q10_owner
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by peekitty
And did Knoppix prompt you for driver discs, or launch "new hardware detected" wizards? No, because all the other drivers for your laptop are already there. It wouldn't go as smoothly if you were doing a new install of Win2000 or god forbid, WinME. Actually, you probably have an 2000 install in your future, if removing the card from device manager and reinstalling it doesn't help (it will reuse the current driver,) you'll probably find that a format & reinstall will do the trick.
Hi peekitty,

I run an m68k Debian distro and SuSE as well as using Knoppix (which is Debian based). I'm a fan. It's not badmouthing Linux to point out that drivers tend to be more available for Windows than Linux. It will be nice when that changes and h/w manufacturers release more Open Source (i.e. GPL or BSD) drivers.

As for a reinstall in my future, it looks like it, as the Control Panel has two copies of the link to the client manager - one which works, and one which doesn't - it looks like a deinstall/reinstall went wrong - probably due to me installing new wireless s/w before removing the old. The non-functional link doesn't want to go away.

I can't convert to Linux-only operation, as the Samsung Q10 is actually for someone who is visually disabled and needs to use a screen reader (Jaws). Unfortunately, although sporadic work is being done on Linux (actually X11) screen readers, there aren't any out there that work sufficiently well yet. Unfortunately, the X windowing protocols and software were not designed with accessibility in mind. MS Windows is the platform of choice for accessibility, and although there are things like blinux out there, accessibility options for those wishing to use alternative OSs are limited. Apple are good, and MacOS X shows promise in that regard, but Apple Accesibility is unlikely to apply to X windowing, for obvious reasons.

Anyway, I was hoping to avoid a reinstall - it looks like I will have a busy weekend.

Finally, given that the wireless card does work under Knoppix 3.4, can anyone advise me as to what drivers I would be best choosing under Windows 2000?

Regards,

s'ung_q10_owner
s'ung_q10_owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2004   #8 (permalink)
peekitty
Macaca
 
peekitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 1,056
As a last ditch effort, you could try removing all the driver files from the /winnt/system32 folder, and then reinstall the card, but it might not have the desired result.
peekitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2004   #9 (permalink)
s'ung_q10_owner
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by peekitty
As a last ditch effort, you could try removing all the driver files from the /winnt/system32 folder, and then reinstall the card, but it might not have the desired result.
I'll give it a go - the worst that happens is I have to reformat and reinstall + plus all the windows updates (sigh) - but I'm planning on doing that anyway.

Thanks.

s'ung_q10_owner
s'ung_q10_owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2004   #10 (permalink)
waitwhat
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1
There is an issue with frame preambles and orinoco cards. They require the access point to use long instead of the more common short preambles. Some wireless routers allow you to change that option, some do not.
waitwhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2004   #11 (permalink)
s'ung_q10_owner
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by waitwhat
There is an issue with frame preambles and orinoco cards. They require the access point to use long instead of the more common short preambles. Some wireless routers allow you to change that option, some do not.
Interesting if true, but not relevant to this problem.

The hardware works perfectly when booted into Knoppix (version shown earlier in thread), connecting to my AP and surfing the web and allowing me to read and post to this forum. This means the 'short vs long preamble' issue does not apply here, as I've made no changes to the base station.

The issue is that I have been unable to get Windows 2000 drivers to work. Plugging in a PCMCIA D-Link card works fine under Windows 2000, the ORiNOCO card works fine under Knoppix (Linux), it just refuses to cooperate under Windows 2000 - or rather Win2K doesn't cooperate with it!

I've not had the time to do a full Windows reinstall this weekend, but it'll probably happen over the next couple of weeks. I'll send Microsoft the bill for my time

In the meantime, can anyone point me towards a _definitive_ place to get Win2K drivers for this ORiNOCO mini PCI card? Is it Lucent/Proxim/Agere/Wavelan/Honky-Tonk Corp. of Taiwan/Whatever?

Thanks all,

s'ung_q10_owner
s'ung_q10_owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.