NetStumbler.org Forums

Go Back   NetStumbler.org Forums > WiFi Forums > Hardware
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-07-2007   #1 (permalink)
Roy_M
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72
Why do AP's need IP addresses?

Hi,

I have a question about the physical structure of an AP. Other than network management considerations, does the IP address in an AP do anything.

As far as I am aware, an AP looks like the attached picture: one Ethernet interface, one 802.11 radio and a bridge used to join the two interfaces at layer 2. The IP address is put on the bridged interface which means that it can be accessed from the wireless interface or the Ethernet interface.

If we consider what happens when a wireless station transmits a frame to an AP, the AP is completely oblivious to all layer three properties of the transmission. Only the router/default-gateway in the wired network will look at the destination IP address of a packet.

So, returning to the original question: is there any reason that an AP has an IP address other than for management to-and-from the AP.

Cheers
Attached Images
File Type: jpg AP_structure_2.jpg (29.5 KB, 86 views)
Roy_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007   #2 (permalink)
ccie4526
My search-fu is weak!
 
ccie4526's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: West BFE, Texas
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy_M
So, returning to the original question: is there any reason that an AP has an IP address other than for management to-and-from the AP.
You said it right there. Management. How else you going to get into the unit remotely and change power output levels, channel assignments, etc., etc.?

__________________
---
<#include std.disclaimer.h>
AltarThug of Wired and Unwired, The Church of WiFi
http://www.churchofwifi.org
http://www.linuxisforbitches.com
http://www.wigle.net
http://www.kismetwireless.net
ccie4526 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007   #3 (permalink)
Roy_M
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72
I thought so.

However, for some reason I have an image in my head of a configuration screen on a Cisco 1200 where they specify a subnet mask of 255.255.255.224. Maybe I'm imagining things.

Thanks for the reply ccie4526

BTW: Are you really a CCIE?
Roy_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007   #4 (permalink)
MikeP928
Heeere's your sign!
 
MikeP928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mexico Beach, FL
Posts: 1,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy_M
I thought so.

However, for some reason I have an image in my head of a configuration screen on a Cisco 1200 where they specify a subnet mask of 255.255.255.224. Maybe I'm imagining things.

Thanks for the reply ccie4526

BTW: Are you really a CCIE?
That could well be a legitimate mask if the ap's is being isolated from the rest of the network via a router.I'm too lazy to figure up how many host addresses that would be.

He probably is a CCIE, and I bet his cert # is 4526.

MikeP
__________________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
MikeP928 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007   #5 (permalink)
Airstreamer
Sniffin' the aether
 
Airstreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: A little North of Reason
Posts: 2,821
Subnet Calc and some other FREE goodies!

http://www.wildpackets.com/products/...ities/overview
__________________
"America is at that awkward stage.
It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards.."

- Claire Wolfe, 101 Things to Do 'Til the Revolution
Airstreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007   #6 (permalink)
ccie4526
My search-fu is weak!
 
ccie4526's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: West BFE, Texas
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeP928
That could well be a legitimate mask if the ap's is being isolated from the rest of the network via a router.I'm too lazy to figure up how many host addresses that would be.
Correct, 255.255.255.224 is /27 mask, gives 32 total addresses in the network range. Less two for network number and broadcast, less one for router, yields 29 available addresses in the subnet for hosts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy_M
BTW: Are you really a CCIE?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeP928
He probably is a CCIE, and I bet his cert # is 4526.
I would be in severe violations of the copyright and trademark laws if I were advertising myself as something I were not. Ergo, you may safely assume that I am IE # 4526. Passed the practical in San Jose in March of '99, right before they added ATM to the test. Due for my recert here in a couple weeks, even.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy_M
However, for some reason I have an image in my head of a configuration screen on a Cisco 1200 where they specify a subnet mask of 255.255.255.224.
AP1200s factory default to an address of 10.0.0.1 with a /27 netmask. Thus what you have in mind is correct. Once you change that, however, all bets are off.
__________________
---
<#include std.disclaimer.h>
AltarThug of Wired and Unwired, The Church of WiFi
http://www.churchofwifi.org
http://www.linuxisforbitches.com
http://www.wigle.net
http://www.kismetwireless.net
ccie4526 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007   #7 (permalink)
Roy_M
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccie4526
Correct, 255.255.255.224 is /27 mask, gives 32 total addresses in the network range. Less two for network number and broadcast, less one for router, yields 29 available addresses in the subnet for hosts.
Host portion


Quote:
Originally Posted by ccie4526
I would be in severe violations of the copyright and trademark laws if I were advertising myself as something I were not. Ergo, you may safely assume that I am IE # 4526. Passed the practical in San Jose in March of '99, right before they added ATM to the test. Due for my recert here in a couple weeks, even.
Best of luck with the exam. I hear it's about has hard as exams get.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccie4526
AP1200s factory default to an address of 10.0.0.1 with a /27 netmask. Thus what you have in mind is correct. Once you change that, however, all bets are off.
Yeah I think thats what I was thinking of. Maybe it is Cisco's way of saying "Dont use too many APs in a broadcast segment"
Roy_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Google
 
Web NetStumbler.org

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.


All messages express the views of the author and are for entertainment purposes only. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the authenticity of the content or the actions of its members. By using this site and its services, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are discriminating, obscene, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violates any laws and you release Netstumbler.org from any future claims of any kind whatsoever including, but not limited to, addiction and loss of productivity. All forum messages, private messages and any other content are properties of Netstumbler.org. Even if publicly available, personal or copyrighted information are not to be posted without the consent of the owner. Distribution of licensed and copyrighted materials in any way not endorsed by the copyright owner is strictly prohibited. You may not use this site and its resources to spam other sites or individuals or perform any action that violates any law. Items sold or bought in the For Sale forum are sold as is and no warranty or insurance of any kind is provided. Netstumbler.org cannot be held responsible for the outcome of any transactions and no warranty of any kind is provided, either express or implied. Vulgar words are not allowed in the subject lines ; they may be used in the message body in any forum. The Administrator, Super Moderators and Moderators of Netstumbler.org have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason and to reveal your identity and other known information in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you.