Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:09 am
bobfunland wrote:
<....snip....>
prez-net
<....snip....>
Hmmm, you been in Maryland around Baltimore? Don't we know a "prez" of some sort
The Ultimate Wireless Forum
http://www.netstumbler.org/
http://www.netstumbler.org/netstumbler/interesting-ap-names-t11311-585.html
bobfunland wrote:
<....snip....>
prez-net
<....snip....>
zarendahl wrote:Part of the irony of this would be that most of the APs along the highway that runs through the middle of town were secured in some obvious way. WEP/WPA/WPA2 were about 60% of the hits.
streaker69 wrote:I do not think that word means what you think it means.
zarendahl wrote:Actually, pretty sure it means exactly what I think it does.
The irony of it is this, most people don't secure the AP. Out of nearly 200 APs found, about 120 were secured. Considering the average, how isn't ironic?
Keep in mind, I'm using complete garbage for gear and do know most of you would find a lot more points then I did.
streaker69 wrote:I'm not exactly seeing the irony here. 120 secured out of 200 is pretty good numbers considering just a few years ago, it was less than 20% were secured.